It’s a bunch of mumble jumble! MAY be due to factors potentially unrelated to jabbing!? Equals they don’t know but want you to think, for some reason, it might not have to do with the jab. MAY be associated with factors not accounted for!?
Again, inconclusive and shows a bias saying it could be due to something we haven’t thought of! The near REAL TIME SURVEILLANCE!? This is an almost admission that this whole thing is experimental! Mandates for job while studies of the affects are ongoing! Crazy!!! Another violation of the Nuremberg Code. It’s like all the other “studies”. Double speak and trickery! Basically, C.O.A. speak.
3 Likes
And what were the monitored outcomes that were “not necessarily causal”? “May be due to factors potentially unrelated to vaccination”? Seems odd that they can state that without knowing what the other factors that are or might otherwise br the cause of that. The way that is worded is like the way a politician caught in a lie speaks.
Not really. The “conclusion” was a bunch of BS trying to cover-up their prior lies. Read the other studies that were in the links I provided earlier. You believe that the same government that has been lying to us for the past several years about this is just going to roll-over and tell you the truth? Benny Hill had a line about that. “I will tell you the truth, I’ll be honest if you rather.”
3 Likes
You have to take the jab to find out whats in the jab.
But yea, I think between frequent mandatory jabs, restrictions on business, travel, energy consumption, imposing artificial foods - it is an experiment in something.
3 Likes
2 Likes
I never trusted it in the first place, so I’m unjabbed as yet. Nor do I ever expect to get the jab. After 2 years, they’re still hiding behind the emergency warning sheets which say that you’re taking it of your own accord. Duck that.
7 Likes
Ivermectin tabs are about six cents apiece.
Jabs are about $80 apiece. Who’s making a killing?
(I would say “so to speak”, but people are actually dying from jabs.)
7 Likes
The massive rise in cancer deaths is partially due to the fact (that I read of) that medical centers were not allowing anyone to be diagnosed nor treated for cancer while Covid was kickin’ around. IOW, negligence by the medicos.
4 Likes
Worse yet, the “vaccine” actually suppresses the immune system, making cancer more likely and more deadly.
3 Likes
What is the massive rise in cancer deaths?
1 Like
78% of covid hospitalizations were obese. 84% had vitamin D deficiency. Over 80% of deaths had 3+ comorbidities. They changed the definition of vaccine to include this experimental MRNA shot. They excluded all deaths within 2 weeks of experimental shot because you are not considered vaccinated until 2 weeks after getting shot.??? It doesn’t cross the blood brain barrier…until it does. It’s 100% effective, 90%, 80%, 70%…30%. Just need a booster. OK 2 boosters. OK a booster every year. Natural immunity is not effective, John Hopkins, Natural immunity provides protection for over 600 days( so far). Soccer players have on average over decades about 20-30 cardiac events. Now over 1000. You have to shut your small business down for safety yet Wal Mart which sees 1000 times more customers per day is safe to go to.
Everything they claimed has turned out to be untrue. The true disease is obesity and unhealthy lifestyle.
6 Likes
Say what you will, but anytime the government gives pharmaceutical companies immunity from prosecution for any side effects, up to and including death, resulting from their products or “experimental” vaccines as a first step in the process does NOT inspire great confidence in the "cure"they force on an unbelieving and distrustful public. The “evolving” guidelines provided by NIH, CDC and the Evil Elf didn’t inspire great confidence either. Maybe it’s a fault in my character…
5 Likes
some say up to 60% from an news article I seen the other day. I couldn’t find it online but I do know of 3 people that their cancer took their lives. 1 of them found about having it around the same time as covid came about.
2 Likes
nope its not just you!!!
I know of several (me included) gulf war (1991) who will not take the shot. because of the experimental anti- nerve agent chemical warfare drugs we had to take before and during deployment. messed a lot of us up during and after
4 Likes
I mostly opted out of this thread early on, but just catching up on the posts from I’m amazed at how easily some people blindly accept a dictate, and how vociferously they defend it — especially after learning that the claims upon which it was based are false.
We were told the vaccine would keep us from getting Covid. It doesn’t.
We were told the vaccine would keep us from spreading Covid. It didn’t.
We were told the vaccine would keep us from being hospitalized for Covid. It hasn’t.
These are the claims from the original promulgators of the vaccine that they themselves have admitted are not the case.
I’m not going to cite any study that you can’t find or won’t read. For my current purpose, that’s unimportant. I’ll simply ask the defenders of all the Covid mandates, why is the “needing” to be vaccinated so heavily marketed, incentivized, and coerced? Where is your skepticism? For virtually any other product, you’d be asking those questions, so why not with the vaccine?
How long are you going to keep jumping when told to jump?
For an excellent analysis of cognitive dissonance, I highly recommend “Mistakes Were Made (but Not By Me) Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts” by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson.
7 Likes
Ivermectin blocks >80% of 3CL protease docking points. And it has the highest docking score against the spike protein. And the highest docking score with other ACE2 protein sites, glycoprotein sites, NSP14 protein, and other PL protein.
The Pfizer jab only works on 3CL protease sites!
Yet Ivermectin (which could have prevented the hospitalization of the vast majority of Covid cases) was banned from being used in the US (citing a dozen studies which the WHO didn’t like) while Pfizer clinched the nomination while making hundreds of billions of dollars from EACH course of the jab.
Corruption is alive and well in our healthcare systems around the globe.
And the jab is still covered by the emergency clause, so Pfizer, et al, are not held liable for all the deaths they continue to cause. It purely sucks.
7 Likes
Don’t forget that for people who got natural immunity from Covid after catching it were completely stripped of that immunity by getting the shot, so their immune systems were left naked against the virus after the shot.
5 Likes
as a plus I seen an request at our local hospital for needing pure blood donations. makes you wonder
5 Likes
Supply and demand, if people demand,
2 Likes
Did you see recently that the FDA is saying they didn’t ban the use of Ivermectin. It was just a suggestion.
5 Likes