the big FU 
to all of the officials that said otherwise
13 Likes
We lost contact with our Son and are still not allowed to see our Grandsons (even via video calls) because we refused the jab after having had Covid and having our blood tests to prove that we had (and still have) natural immunity.
We have lost out family over this. I have no words any more.
This was a biological weapon used to attack our Country in order to divide us as a Nation. And it worked. It destroyed families, closed Churches and turned us against one another.
14 Likes
@Frank73
I’m in the same situation (kind of) I have family members who also won’t come near my wife and i because we didn’t take the jab.
for medical reasons and I don’t trust the government. they already got me while I was in the army in 1990. nerve agent antidote pills and a shot that was supposed to protect us from nerve agents that the Iraqis and Saddam were using.
8 Likes
Wow I can’t imagine that situation, and must be hard to deal with. Sorry that’s happening to you and your family. But even video calls seems extreme and must be a difference of politics maybe? My wife and I had some run-ins with her family and my family on the issue because we wouldn’t do it but nothing like that. I actually had COVID twice and she had it once and we’re like, hey we survived, it was not fun, but we’re still here. Meanwhile my Dad, Grandpa, and a very close family friend of hers had every available jab and each was hospitalized with her friend dying. So much for the vaccine.
For a nation that doesn’t bow or negotiate with terrorists, we sure are ignoring this issue with China. It must raise one’s eyebrows and ask why. Is it truly just the fear of their nuclear threat or is it because we have a few key bureaucrats that are political allies?
4 Likes
Sorry to hear that @Frank73! That’s sad. My wife and I are the only ones in my entire family and her entire family not vaccinated. Early on, my in-laws were putting a little pressure on us but they gave up. Luckily our families haven’t got too wild about us staying away.
4 Likes
Yes, you were more fortunate than many in regard to family and friends. My wife, (adult) daughter and I, are the only ones in our immediate families to have not gotten the death shots. We have some friends that also refused to get those shots. One of my wife’s decades-long close friends stopped being a friend over that. My closest friends also were mostly anti-shot, too. One did get the shot because he felt pressured by his family enough to do so, but not the entire regimen.
The “vaccination” program definitely was designed to fracture society and families and it worked. The sick part is the inclusion of it into the childhood vaccination mandate. The Biden administration is also still requiring it for legal travel into the USA.
6 Likes
Republicandaily.com? I’m sure thats an unbiased news source. Sorry for all your hardships, but if you refuse to acknowledge science and instead believe fantasy conspiracy theories, you going to have problems.
Oh, and did you hear the one about the FEMA emergeny test today over cell phones? It was supposed to activate the microchips in the vaccine. Did you believe that too?
2 Likes
2 Likes
Here is some data that I would assume you would consider as a valid sources as it is from the CDC, NIH, AHA, and Salk.edu. Granted it is old, but I did not feel your disengenuous post required further research - if you were honest, you would do your own research.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers (fda.gov)
WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA) AND THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE? There is a remote chance that the vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to one hour after getting a dose of the vaccine. For this reason, your vaccination provider may ask you to stay at the place where you received your vaccine for monitoring after vaccination. Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include:
• Difficulty breathing
• Swelling of your face and throat
• A fast heartbeat
• A bad rash all over your body
• Dizziness and weakness
Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. In most of these people, symptoms began within a few days following receipt of the second dose of vaccine. The chance of having this occur is very low. You should seek medical attention right away if you have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine:
• Chest pain
• Shortness of breath
• Feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart
Side effects that have been reported with COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine include:
• severe allergic reactions
• non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face
• myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle)
• pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart)
• injection site pain
• tiredness
• headache Revised: 23 August 2021
• muscle pain
• chills
• joint pain
• fever
• injection site swelling
• injection site redness
• nausea
• feeling unwell
• swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy)
• diarrhea
• vomiting
• arm pain
These may not be all the possible side effects of the vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The possible side effects of the vaccine are still being studied in clinical trials.
Reactions and Adverse Events of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine | CDC
Here are some studies on the spike protein that is the injection.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
Paradoxically, ACE2 is protective in the cardiovascular system, and SARS-CoV-1 S protein promotes lung injury by decreasing the level of ACE2 in the infected lungs. In the current study, we show that S protein alone can damage vascular endothelial cells (ECs) by downregulating ACE2 and consequently inhibiting mitochondrial function.
We administered a pseudovirus expressing S protein (Pseu-Spike) to Syrian hamsters intratracheally. Lung damage was apparent in animals receiving Pseu-Spike, revealed by thickening of the alveolar septa and increased infiltration of mononuclear cells.
We next studied the impact of S protein on mitochondrial function. Confocal images of ECs treated with S1 protein revealed increased mitochondrial fragmentation, indicating altered mitochondrial dynamics.
Although the use of a noninfectious pseudovirus is a limitation to this study, our data reveals that S protein alone can damage endothelium, manifested by impaired mitochondrial function and eNOS activity but increased glycolysis.
This related article provides information related to the AHA study but in a less technical language:
In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.
Previous studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.
The researchers next hope to take a closer look at the mechanism by which the disrupted ACE2 protein damages mitochondria and causes them to change shape.
Concerning major adverse effects in patients receiving vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, local effects predominate, and severe systemic reactions are rarely described (Yuan et al., 2020). However, recent reports of an increased risk of blood clots, particularly of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in the case of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (Mahase 2021), raised a matter of debate on the safety of COVID-19 vaccine in general. Comprehensive analysis of autopsy data must be performed to provide more detailed insights into lethal adverse effects and any deaths associated with vaccination.
Kuba et al. showed that the injection of mice with recombinant SARS-CoV-1 spike protein reduced the ACE2 expression and worsened the acid-induced lung injury. In mice with an acid-induced lung injury, the recombinant SARS-CoV-1 spike protein dramatically increased angiotensin II, and the angiotensin receptor inhibitor losartan attenuated the spike protein-induced enhancement of lung injury. Thus, these in vivo studies demonstrated that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-1 (without the rest of the virus)* reduces the ACE2 expression, increases the level of angiotensin II, and exacerbates the lung injury.
Our laboratory only tested the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in lung vascular cells and those implicated in the development of PAH. However, this protein may also affect the cells of systemic and coronary vasculatures, eliciting other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, systemic hypertension, and stroke. In addition to cardiovascular cells, other cells that express ACE2 have the potential to be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which may cause adverse pathological events. Thus, it is important to consider the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced by the new COVID-19 vaccines triggers cell signaling events that promote PAH, other cardiovascular complications, and/or complications in other tissues/organs in certain individuals.
-
- Note: The spike protein of SARS-CoV-1 (without the rest of the virus) is what the “vaccine” is.
3 Likes
The OSHA standard for an 8-hour exposure (time-weight average) to CO2 is 5,000 ppm (0.5%).
Fresh air has around 0.04% (400 ppm) CO2. Wearing masks more than 5 minutes bears a possible chronic exposure to carbon dioxide of 1.41% to 3.2% (14,100 – 32,000 ppm) of the inhaled air (Possible toxicity of chronic carbon dioxide exposure associated with face mask use, particularly in pregnant women, children and adolescents - A scoping review - PubMed).
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) recommends an 8-hour TWA (Time-Weighted Average) Threshold Limit Value (TLV) of 5,000 ppm and a Ceiling exposure limit (not to be exceeded) of 30,000 ppm for a 10-minute period. A value of 40,000 is considered immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH value) (https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2020-08/Carbon-Dioxide.pdf).
The TLV-STEL (Threshold Limit Value-Short-term Exposure Limit) is based on short-term studies which showed that “concentrations of 27,600 to 39,500 ppm produced increased pulmonary ventilation rates. Therefore, a TLV-STEL of 30,000 ppm is considered appropriate.”
2 Likes
This is from a report produced by BioNTech. It shows death rates by country and their studies of their vaccines with resultant vaccine-related injuries and deaths.
2 Likes
This is just a sample of the data available, if you had an ounce of concern, and not just suck-up the bs narrative, you would do the research. Knowledge will set you free. The worst of this is that the CDC is reporting the truth on their website, but publishing 100% non-sense in their media releases. It does not take much to find the truth, if you actually wanted to know.
3 Likes