How many THOUSANDS were killed or maimed by the “vaccines” or driven out of the military for reusing to take them? Highly trained, skilled and dedicated. ….gone… Eliminated by their own Commander-in-Chief. We no longer need the Chinese, Russians or Muslims. The United States of America is being destroyed by its own government.
4 Likes
But still banned here. Grrrrr.
It’s not banned here. In the states. All Day Chemists has and had both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. I was able to get both right in the middle of the experiment relatively easy. Like, not as fast as a pharmacy would have been able to get it to me if they weren’t hand tied by the federal system, but faster than I expected.
2 Likes
It was yes and no. People who wished to obtain ivermectin, could. I also recall Ohio Board of Pharma threaten to revoke licence of any chemist who filled an Rx (legitimate Rx from an MD!!!) for Ivermectin.
5 Likes
Oh yes, I totally agree! But to me “legitimate” Pharma has become like FDA and USDA approved, totally un-desirable and possibly dangerous.
Seriously though, all of those entities have been educated HARD! Like, thinks there’s too many people on the planet hard! They also know it’s a sin to know what you ought to do and not do it! That’s a scary combo!!
3 Likes
Does everyone know you can boil up some citrus peels to extract quinine!? It’s the O.G. hydroxychloriQUINE! People just used to eat the peels to avoid malaria in Central America but it was too grody, then they tried boiling it but again, too bitter. Then they made it into tonic water to ease the pain of the bitterness and eventually made it a pill. Literally the whites of the peel is where the hydroxychloriquine call’s home base. Is this misinformation? Go fact checker it!
3 Likes
It’s banned in OR, and I’ve seen reports that half a dozen other states are as well, or were. I haven’t checked this year. Maybe I should keep looking around. I’d rather not get forced into the jab if I can possibly help it, and I’d much prefer to get out of jeopardy with Ivermectin if I got really loaded with Covid.
4 Likes
Or hydroxychloriquine or lots of extra Vitamin D+K+C+zinc. You or anyone can get any of that stuff in any state right now and at any time during the experiment. None of it required a prescription. Seriously, mandated JAB!? So wild!
2 Likes
Yeah. Getting jabbed is all on you. I walked away from 140k/yr job and i will do it again when the next engineered/weaponized virus comes out.
8 Likes
good for you, I lost a whole section of family and friends over my objection of getting jabbed.
uncle sam got me 30 years ago with experimental vaccines. never again for something that was a bit worse than the flu when I got the wu-flu covid
5 Likes
Yeah. Yeah. 24 yrs Army. Remember the gammagoblin?
Got shot up with that every time I deployed anywhere. Still no idea what it is/was. Thought the army was protecting me…from something.
2 Likes
ya I remember it. it would leave a big knot where it was injected
3 Likes
Don’t move when it’s your turn.
2 Likes
I learned of the potential for this shot to cause clots shortly after it was released. As a retired RN who had administered medications approved for emergency use only, I was shocked at how quickly the mRNA shots were rolled out to the general public and given as though they were long standing medications with years of use on millions of people. This clotting thing is not so new or surprising if one has been following this story from its inception.
6 Likes
I did some digging, and this story is a little more complex than headlines or Twitter feeds permit.
The actual name of the study is “Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older.” Rather than giving my amateur interpretation of it, I suggest you try a search (in quotes) with a few different search engines.
Headlines stating that the FDA has announced that the vaccine causes blood clots are false. The FDA has not said this.
Similarly, the fact-checking sites which claim the story is completely false are missing the mark.
The FDA did participate in the study, which seems to indicate a relationship between the Pfizer vaccine and increased rate of blood clots in the lungs. However, as anyone who can spell “statistics” can tell you, correlation does not prove causation. What the FDA has announced is that they have enough indicators to warrant a more thorough study. This is normal in the pharma world.
If I may give my own personal opinion, based on what I’ve read: We don’t know enough (yet) to prove that the Pfizer vaccine is completely safe, nor that it causes harm. Make your own decisions. Personally, I’m not worried about the vaccine. If I may be cynical for a moment, though, consider the staggering amount of money involved in the Pfizer vaccine. If they suddenly found out that it makes people you grow a third nipple and a monkey tail, do you think they’d really make that data public?
It’s kind of funny: 3 years ago, it was the American left that was so suspicious of “Big Pharma.” We flipped that vinyl 45 faster than the Democrats turned on Elon Musk.
6 Likes
For that entity to admit they’ve seen enough to know they haven’t seen enough about a jab that makes them billions is a really big deal. They would never make public any negative opinions unless they knew they had to. I can’t see a major company mandating a jab that wasn’t perceived as 99.9999999% safe and effective. We’ll see though. Seems like pharma is cooking up another one!
2 Likes
I’ll bet nothing is 99.9999999% safe and effective, not even gun ownership
5 Likes
Nobody is trying to force you to inject guns into your body. It’s unprecedented and for anybody to force another to inject something into their body they’d better be as close to 100% as a guy can get. I’m surprised to see the fda admit publicly that they know enough to know, they don’t know enough. That’s a serious development.
3 Likes
Nobody is trying to force me to inject anything into my body. I’m sorry for those in a different situation.
I wonder if ibuprofen is 99.9999999% safe?
Granted, forced vs personal choice is a definitive difference here, for some.
2 Likes
Yes, and I was fortunate to not have my income dependent on companies mandating the jab. I think the main takeaway from this thread is that yes, it has been admitted that pharma does not know enough to say the shots are not directly related to heart problems. If there were anyway they could avoid saying those words they would and couldn’t. That says a lot to me.
4 Likes