Right, whoever invited this guy should be removed from government, two things happened. They intentionally invited the guy, or they have been communicating with him so much his name came up in their auto complete. Either case says they are not fit for Government and working on their next book like every person who has ever worked under Trump. Reality is, if you were not rich before you worked under the Trump administration, you will be writing books after it and the books all report the same exact thing, which nobody reads because reading is for eggheads.
1 Like
âWar plansâ
WTF ever. 
3 Likes
The Atlantic released the messages today claiming since the Admin says that nothing in the messages was classified that itâs ok for the American Public to see it.
1 Like
You guys are bending over backward to make this seem like the journalists fault. All stories are that he was added to the thread by mistake - not phishing or anything else. The real story and the real problem is that cabinet officials were using unsanctioned and unsecure text messaging app to discuss classified military plans. So right now, the UK, EU countries, Isreal and all of our other friends are cutting off sharing intel with the U.S. immediately until these idiots are removed from their positions. And whose to say that Russia and China donât have a backdoor into the Signal messages? When the only qualification for the job is fealty to Trump, you get a bunch of unqualified ass-clowns and youshouldnât be surprised that this is turning into a circus.
2 Likes
Everyone know the place to keep highly classified intel is in cardboard boxes in the Mar-a-lago bathrooms.
1 Like
Nope, Delaware and a vette.
7 Likes
I definitely do not think the problem is the journalist. And I do believe that this Administration gambled on their response to the situation hoping that the American Public believes their position. Will have to see how things play out today after everyone and their mother gets inundated with news of what was in the messages. Going to be a lot of armchair quarterbacking going on today.
2 Likes
When I said âyou guysâ, I meant those guys. They know who they are. Youâre kinda new here - welcome. Iâm the pain in the ass on this site that tries to keep people honest. Contrary to what most think of me here, Iâm a lifelong republican, but I donât buy into the MAGA lies. Both Republicans and Democrats lie and do shitty things, but Trump takes it to a whole new level. Most people here that claim to love the constitution donât realize we are sliding very quickly into fascism.
1 Like
Ok, this reminds of the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax. I am not convinced that it even happened. What makes more sense? That Pete Hegseth would invite a journalist from the Atlantic magazine, you know the nut jobs that want Socialism for all, to be witness to sensitive war plans? Or that just maybe this could be the Democrats new plan for trying to get rid of Pete Hegseth? It reminds me of the January 6th Committee when they found out from the âhonorableâ Adam Schiff that he found a âwhistleblowerâ that had âsolidâ evidence against President Trump. 
6 Likes
Thatâs because itâs the same journalist that pushed that hoax, among a slew of others.
I feel bad for the folks who are against Making America Great Again. Weâre going to do it with or without you, thatâs just the way its going to be, so buckle up buttercups!
5 Likes
And there are lots of Chinese moles in country who identify as Americans! 
Hell, we have men who identify as women, but that doesnât make them women!
We even have âfurriesâ that identify as animals!
5 Likes
No, the problem is not the journalist. The problem is that the journalist was copied on the invite, from a National Security Advisorâs phone, when the Advisor has said he doesnât even know the journalist. HOW did the journalist number (Especially THIS anti-Trump journalist) get on the phone? WHO put the number on the National Security Advisorsâ phone? I sure as hell donât believe in coincidences, especially in the political realm. This was a setup.
6 Likes
I wouldnât be the least bit surprised.
At the end of the day, the mission was a success and our Service men/women were unscathed.
Was a mistake made? Certainly. The appropriate remedies will be carried out and we will continue to fight on.
Speaking of our war fighters⊠I find it quite ironic that the democrats, including those on this site, are calling for resignations and/or terminations. This was a successful mission. No American lives lost, no equipment damaged, destroyed or left for the taking. Seems to me there were a fair few brave soldiers lost during the Biden administration. My memory is good, the same outrage though???
Hmm, maybe the brain injuries Iâve suffered are taking a greater toll that I realized.
6 Likes
That would be saying not identifying. In actuality it would be the opposite, legally they would be American if their doing their job right but they would identify with China if they were a mole.
I doubt it was a âsetupâ if it was they would have chosen to leak a chat that had way more conteversy not talking about a strike.
Add to that, that the conversation was âsensitiveâ but NOT âclassifiedâ. Invitees were told to âGo higherâ for more information that WAS classified.
And yeah, where was the righteous indignation from the left for the Afghanistan screwup when people did die, unnecessarily, and where was the worry about national security for years of a sitting presidentâs OBVIOUS COGNITIVE DECLINE? Where was the concern for national security when we found that biden family family members were receiving monies and jewels from Russia and China?
5 Likes
those are 2 very diffrent things but both are very weird.
Breaking News Update
Not unlike Trump.
Whoever put the journalistsâ number on the National Security Advisorsâ phone couldnât know when it would be inadvertantly used, but the planted number COULD be used to embarrass the administration in the future, if an argument could be made by the left that there was internal strife going on in the administration, and they could direct the turmoil as originating from the National Security Advisor. An investigation would ensue, and the number could be used as evidence that Waltz was sympathetic to the left, and possibly leaking info.
2 Likes