The Current Definition of Racism

According to the democratic party, a person of color cannot be racist. Only White people can be racist because of their history towards people of color. Other indicators of White racism include overall economic prosperity and status in social circles. So when a black girl baits her own people of color and receives death threats for doing so, it creates an image of insanity and/or comedy. Which is it, democrats? How can you threaten your own? Is it degrees of blackness that compels you or an overall sense of losing votes? In either case more and more people are seeing the absurdity of your actions.

8 Likes

Which Democratic Party is that?

3 Likes

Who the actual F gave you access to a keyboard?

You know damned good and well who’s being referred to in that statement.

Tiresome doesn’t begin to describe your projected pacifism and naivety.

8 Likes

Well if you know, tell me. It could be any body. I know democrats and they don’t think that. I find his comment has no meaning. What is the relevance of yours?

3 Likes

Listen to this guy talk for 5 minutes and you’ll know for certain.Brandon Johnson fleshes out senior staff, shows continued influence of Toni Preckwinkle, Chicago Teachers Union

8 Likes

What an idiot. I have been staring at him for ten minutes and he hasn’t said anything.

2 Likes

A better definition might be a hate hoax. I worked with someone that perpetuated one by drawing a swastika on the outside of the building. He also claimed he drove around rural areas looking for racism and seemed genuinely shocked when he never found it. People with that mentality are not able to seek out information for themselves, and rely on a broken apparatus to tell them what to think. This does not typically happen with people that care about individual freedom. Ignorance requires a collective (majority rule) to propagate and maintain ignorant ideas.

8 Likes

So if we keep a positive outlook instead of blaming someone else it shouldn’t propagate.

I guess I’m not understanding the point you are trying to make. There are plenty of people that have a positive outlook on life that violate other people’s rights or consent, while trying to convince everyone that the way they are behaving is just and good.

I also don’t know who is being blamed, or for what. I don’t want to get you wrong, but this seems like a ā€œgotchaā€ statement. If you are making a direct statement against something in the video, I don’t need to watch it to know what was said. Salty Cracker is overzealous a lot, but is pretty fair when it comes to providing the full context of the subject matter of his videos. No matter who the creator is, you need to balance information you watch with what you can tangibly witness in the real world. Everyone just taking surface level information off the internet is being compartmentalized and much of the truth is not being offered. For the same reason the National Enquirer was so popular. The truth doesn’t matter if people are addicted, and you can make a lot of money by keeping people engaged and selling ad space.

2 Likes

What I am implying is the OP’s first post implies this is the fault of the democrats. When it isn’t. It is the fault of blame. If people would address the issues instead of blaming someone we may be able to address the concerns.

3 Likes

It’s how oligarchs want us to think and interact so they can keep stealing our money. That’s why they had to lie to us about slavery, democracy, and most of the world’s history. People that have access to the truth are dangerous to people that want to rule. If we bicker with each other, then we are too busy to address tyranny.

3 Likes

Salty Cracker did address the issue, leftist racist ideology. One cannot have a rational conversation with someone suffering - scatch that - someone with such hatred. I have seen and experienced it myself. No opportunity for discussion, and not wanted by the ones expressing such hatred.

8 Likes

IMHO you sir have NOT been paying attention to what is currently happening all over the country but mostly in blue states and cities…

but this seems to be how you typically deal with stuff you disagree with…

about had it with your slant/bias on things… may block you…

IMHO people like you enable their sh*t…

you say play nice love love love… they say ya do that then proceed to do and be the opposite

at some point ya gotta shake the dust from your feet and deal with them as they seem to require…

10 Likes

That is not how to deal with evil. We don’t fight evil by being evel. ( blaming someone). We fight evil by fighting for love. If that causes you to block me then I brush the dust off.

2 Likes

I have seen this, as well. As I said before, ignorance requires a collective/mob/democracy to bully people into their position. They often project their failures onto individuals they don’t agree with. Which is how you get insane coping strategies like Horseshoe Theory. It doesn’t work, because in a debate ignorance is defeated by two individuals with competing ideas, and the least ignorant person is the victor. People with weak arguments will bring out the logical fallacies first.

4 Likes

Why do you bother engaging these fools, Will? The ship has sailed.

6 Likes

This shows how off the rails your mindset has gone. Blaming a person or group or organization for their own actions is NOT evil. In fact, speaking truth to someone, especially a truth they my find hurtful, is an expression of love and respect. Nothing evil in it. Lying to someone or ignoring their bad behavior, their ignorance, their mistakes, is an expression of contempt and dismissal.

Your doctrine of total love and total forgiveness gives the worst actors a free pass to continue their evil acts and even take them even further to another (lower) level. That’s not helpful to either side, it’s destructive to both.

11 Likes

Yeah. Basically, you can say ā€œWelcome,ā€ but don’t be a doormat.

The movement to perpetuate people’s psychosis, and not offend people by being politically correct has just made people more entitled than they deserve to be. When only one side is sacrificing their freedom of speech, then it’s no longer a freedom that every individual is entitled to by law.

Most of the people that really love(d) me, were critical of me and told me things that were not what I wanted to hear. Especially if the course I was taking was incorrect or self destructive. Wisdom and shame are important parts of society that a section of the population is fighting very hard to strip away. They are how we develop a conscience.

5 Likes

BRAVO BLOOD BROTHER! Freakin’ BRAVO!
I am sorry , I let this FOOL continue to INSULT me and us with his continued Bullfitch Love, Love, Love crap! then when confronted Robert turns it back ON US!. He’s NOT a Gunner, He’s NOT …I’ll just say on MY SIDE.
He just finds a ā€˜Peacenik’ way to ramp us all up and some here continue to ENGAGE with him.
No more from me. He’s set to 'IGNORE/FOREVER now.
We HAVE to stop Molly-Coddling these folk’s, These Demoncrats, These Racist Blacks who continue to spout their HATE by blaming ā€˜WHITEY’ for all their stoopid Self Destructive actions.
I didn’t TELL ANTIFA to burn down sections of Portland!, I didn’t Support any Protests. I don’t support any of this RESISTANCE TO AMERICA’S PEACE AND PROSPERITY that Trump is bringing us.
Robert in my opinion is a ā€˜Fence sitter’ and part of the problem.
He’s the type of guy who’ll get two guys to fight then stand back asking the crowd gathered ā€˜Why are they fighting?’
We have a little ways to go before all this crap is settled, maybe next weekend will be the beginning of the end, but on this Forum we have a Growing problem of Decenters and I’m starting my little house cleaning with Robert.
SEE YA PAL----IGNORED

2 Likes

No it doesn’t. There was no consoling here. It is out right hate. Consolation is an act of love. Where was that? I feel you are misinterpreting my consolation. Total love is the answer. It is why I carry a gun. It is why I do everything I do. One has to think critically about what love is. That is what I stand for even if I stand alone.

1 Like