Please be careful with Mr. Rittenhouse. the Prosecution was a joke and many errors were made and the
bad guys were not clean nor angels and the Judge and juries did very well. Rittenhouse was a very close call and please never repeat the nightmare. You probably not be so lucky.
@William_H, Iâm really not sure what youâre trying to convey here, or even to whom youâre necessarily replying, but if the response above is directed to me, then I can tell you you are 100% wrong. That it does not show anything of the kind.
You made a statement, several statements, in fact. Can you back them up with examples or evidence, or are you just trolling the community?
Respect to you, you have not followed your training. I am finished with this and please train with your instructors. The USCCA Instructor care about you and everyone as members and students of USCCA. I do not and never will stop caring about anyone here. These Instructors have spent many years of their life to help and protect every member here. You are not the problem, never will be.
The man named Kyle Rittenhouse is also being demanded to be let go from Arizona State University
College and is being nicked named Killer Kyle. He has his own problem and could cause many more problems for himself. He may be innocent, but not the end of the problems and nightmare.
Please study the books on self and home defense. Protect your family and know your State Laws. Another book: Concealed Carry and Home Defense Fundamentals by Michael Martin. Be a HERO and
save a life or hundreds, please. I am finished with this, but I do care.
The Surprising Way Gun Laws Are Used Against Us
[The Surprising Way Gun Laws Are Used Against Usâ â Carry Daily]The Surprising Way Gun Laws Are Used Against Usâ - Carry Daily
Watch: Gun Owners of America Blows This Subject Out of the Park!
Gun Control!
Woke fool and his money are soon parted
Last line in the piece:
âEDIT: This is fake news started by a group called Potatriots who also started a rumor about Rittenhouse suing The View. It didnât happen and according to Rittenhouse Lawyers, there is no paperwork being filed at this time to sue anyone for defamation.â
I didnt see that. He does have a long list of big wallets to sue.
Yes, yes he does. Iâm looking forward to watching that.
âThat was a lie:â Florida Gov. DeSantis says media got certain facts of Kyle Rittenhouse case wrong
Gov. DeSantis claims media lied about Kyle Rittenhouse | firstcoastnews.com
Rittenhouse had his reasons to be there, even if we would not have done so. We should keep in mind that he had the right to make that choice. The question is not âwas his choice wrong?â The question was âwas he attacked and needed to defend himself?â
He was and he did. End of story.
This article shows a profound photo from ASU leftists protesting K.R. Great insight, isnât it?
We are truly generating another generation ofâŠpeople who cnaât think for themselves, are afraid of facts, and believe that the world morphs to their fantasies.
This is a tragedy. Yet it underscores the difference in parenting style. Also, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord.
If you want divine irony, YouTube presents this video to me with an ad for sandyhookaction: âDemand Congress stop assault rifle salesâ. With a suggested viewing scroll of 2A stuff and Faux News tropes, because I use this browser pretty much only for USCCA.
Algorithms smart enough to choke a horse.
The difference between Davion Jones and Kyle Rittenhouse is the latter gets to win $100s of millions from lying MSM. Other than that, the lesson is identical: donât mob and threaten people, donât be antifa, and if you puck around, youâll find out.
PS. It is notable, Jones admitted to police he had fired âwith his eyes closedâ. This shows his fear, but also a degree of recklessness, since he lost control of his aim.
Win? Heâs earned it and it would be great if he could sink CNN and their ilk.
I donât shoot often, but when I do, I am the most accurate with my eyes closed. OkayâŠIâm not that bad.
There is going to be a battle in a civil court that he has yet to win. I am rooting for him though.
In court I would argue what does my online persona has to do with this case specifically? If itâs not related to this case at all then youâre violating my first amendment rights.
I post a lot on tik tok and any prosecutor can take my tik toks put things out of context and misconstrue them to make me look guilty. Even some of the USCCA videos, I can tell the court I was trained by the USCCA. All they have to do is take this specific USCCA video take it out of context and play the words, âPut a bullet or 2 in the central nervous system, either brain or the spine, shut him off like a switch. If you canât do that put as many holes as you can into the chest cavity, let the lungs fill up with blood, stop the heart and stop the threatâ and then all the prosecuting attorney has to say is Iâm listening to people that are telling me how to specifically kill somebody. That when I shot that person, I meant to shut him off like a switch, and I meant to fill his lungs with blood.
I made it a rule if I defend myself that I wonât be posting on social media for a while, and wonât post or talk about the case until after itâs over.
Why donât we talk about how to combat this in court instead of just letting the prosecution take something irrelevant and run it through?