State lawmakers propose six gun control bills ahead of 2025 legislative session


(The Center Square) – In less than two weeks, state legislators will convene for the 2025 legislative session, taking action on hundreds of bills, six of which they have already proposed around gun control.

There’s still plenty of time to propose more throughout the 105-day session, but three have come out of the state House of Representatives, with three more from the Senate. Democrats are behind all but two, with a Republican from each chamber floating their own.

Proponents say the bills could reduce gun violence and protect public safety, while critics might call them an overreach, further impeding their constitutional rights. The blue majority has passed numerous gun control measures over the past few years and will likely continue.

Senate Bill 5056

Rep. Keith Wagoner, R-Sedro Woolley, proposed [Senate Bill 5056](Washington State Legislature), one of two firearm-related measures to come from his party so far. The legislation follows a two-week delay in the Administrative Office of the Courts’ background check system in November.

The Washington State Patrol nearly faced lawsuits after being unable to conduct the checks during the delay; however, if the majority approves SB 5056, it would mitigate this by directing the WSP to process the work itself if the system becomes inaccessible for at least seven days.

According to the proposal, if the AOC’s system is down, the WSP would utilize the national instant criminal background check system and any relevant state records systems or other databases and resources that are still available.

Senate Bill 5098

Sen. Javier Valdez, D-Seattle, and Sen. Rebecca Saldaña, D-Seattle, proposed Senate Bill 5098, which would expand where it’s illegal to open-carry a firearm. If approved, it would expand the list to include public parks and recreational facilities where “children are likely to be present.”

According to the proposal, municipalities could designate which facilities children will likely frequent and post the appropriate signage at access points. The measure would also expand restrictions to include county fairs and buildings where government officials perform their duties.

State law already restricts open-carry in jails, law enforcement facilities, court-related facilities, certain mental health facilities, airports and other transit facilities, accredited zoos, and areas off-limits to individuals under 21 years of age.

The bill includes exemptions for law enforcement, military, and concealed carry permit holders. Violations could result in a gross misdemeanor, up to a $5,000 fine, 364 days in jail and potentially restrictions on future firearm possession for repeat offenders.

Senate Bill 5099

Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek, and Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen proposed Senate Bill 5099, which would require firearms dealers to meet additional security and compliance obligations.

The bill would update several pieces of language in existing law, clarifying requirements such as metal bars on doors and windows, adding sufficient interior lighting and authorizing law enforcement to access dealers’ security systems during an active investigation.

The measure also adds nearly two pages on when the WSP can revoke a dealer’s license. Another page requires the WSP to develop or approve online training courses for those working at licensed dealers. These courses must include at least 20 questions and require a 70% score to pass.

In addition to other licensing and compliance requirements, SB 5099 would restrict unlicensed “dealers” or hobbyists from transferring firearms or ammunition before obtaining a license. The law currently only restricts unlicensed dealers from selling or transferring any “pistol.”

The bill redefines dealers to include anyone who sells over 11 firearms or specific components annually.

House Bill 1118

Sen. Tarra Simmons, D-Kitsap, and Sen. Joel McEntire, D-Cathlamet, proposed House Bill 1118, which would restore convicted criminals’ right to possess a firearm. If approved, it would expand the eligibility for those convicted of certain offenses to petition to regain their rights.

According to the proposal, individuals convicted of felony sex offenses, Class A felonies or those with maximum sentences of at least 20 years would remain unable to petition; however, those with convictions, even repeated, of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act could.

Individuals convicted of narcotics violations, whether their sentence is 20 years or longer, since the USCA allows for sentencing outside of the standard range, could petition if approved.

Notably, Simmons, the prime sponsor of the bill, was previously convicted and sentenc Making ANTI=GUN PLOICY—Yeah, I can see that!ed to 30 months in prison for narcotics violations in 2011. She became the state’s first formerly incarcerated lawmaker in 2021 before the courts vacated her felony convictions in 2023.
Totally F–kin’ trustworthy this one! A DRUGGIE CONVICTED FELON SENATOR!
House Bill 1132

Rep. Darya Farivar, D-Seattle, Rep. Tim Ormsby, D-Spokane, and Rep. Cindy Ryu, D-Shoreline, proposed House Bill 1132. The measure would limit “bulk” purchases and transfers of firearms and ammunition over any given month if approved.

The proposal doesn’t directly define “bulk.” Still, it prohibits dealers from selling or transferring more than one firearm and a maximum of 100 rounds of .50 caliber ammunition or 1,000 rounds of any other caliber to an individual within a 30-day period.

While 1,000 rounds sound like a lot, enthusiasts often buy in “bulk” to curb costs, as a typical range day could include shooting hundreds of rounds. If approved, individuals could face a $500 penalty upon first conviction, with a misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor for repeated violations.

House Bill 1139

Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens, proposed House Bill 1139, the only other firearm-related measure from his party so far. If approved, it would reclassify certain offenses as violent crimes and direct law enforcement to arrest potential offenders with probable cause.

According to the proposal, unlawful possession of a firearm in the first degree would be considered a “violent offense.” Reclassifying the crime allows the courts to enforce stricter penalties and longer sentences. ARE CRIMINALS EVER INCLUDED IN ANY OF THESE BILLS? Askin’ for a Friend!
Another provision would retain vacated firearm convictions in an individual’s criminal history to calculate their “offended score,” which affects their sentence length.

Honorable Mention - “Tax on Sale of Ammunition & Firearms”

While not technically proposed, Sen. Noel Frame, D-Seattle, emailed peers last month offering various solutions to fill the state’s $16 billion shortfall.

All seven included in her email could generate over $15 billion in taxes over the next four years in addition to the billions that Gov. Inslee proposed days earlier to fill part of the hole.

One option included an 11% tax on ammunition, firearms and “parts,” in addition to any existing taxes. The state already imposes its 6.5% sales tax rate on top of local sales taxes and the federal government’s 10% to 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition.
I guess the .gov needs more MONEY, Money, Money! Monnnnnnnnnney!
“Let’s spread that tax policy love around,” Frame emailed her peers in the Senate.

How are these Criminals STILL HOLDING OFFICE?
Thomas Jefferson JUST THREW UP IN HIS SKULL!

REMEMBER THEIR NAMES!

9 Likes

This is just more government overreach. What part of the constitution do they not understand “shall not be infringed “. This just gives criminals more intell where they can strike at the most unprotected places. Question when did criminals ever start obeying gun laws

11 Likes

Welcome to the fold Brother Darrell
You are right where you’re suppose to be !
USCCA STRONG!’

You know the old saying Bruh? 'The Constitution doesn’t have to be rewritten it has to be READ! These Criminals don’t know, care about INFRINGING our rights man. They WANT US DISARMED so we can be the SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTER! Railroad Boxcars for (77) MILLION anyone?
It worked in 1938!
What Laws have they written, What sanctions have they imposed on Criminals in the last (4) years? NADA.
Open Borders—the Worlds Terrorists INVITED IN!
Chinese Drones, Balloons, Submarines parked off Brooklyn

FIGHTS ON BRUH! You joined @ the right time. WEAPONS FREE!

7 Likes

Good question welcome to the community.

5 Likes

Yep. Remember their names …

Rep. Keith Wagoner, R-Sedro Woolley, proposed [Senate Bill 5056]
Sen. Javier Valdez, D-Seattle, and Sen. Rebecca Saldaña, D-Seattle,* proposed Senate Bill 5098
Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek, and Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen
proposed Senate Bill 5099
Sen. Tarra Simmons, D-Kitsap, and Sen. Joel McEntire, D-Cathlamet,
proposed House Bill 1118
Rep. Darya Farivar, D-Seattle, Rep. Tim Ormsby, D-Spokane, and Rep. Cindy Ryu, D-Shoreline,
proposed House Bill 1132
Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens,
proposed *House Bill 1139
Sen. Noel Frame, D-Seattle, emailed peers last month offering various solutions to fill the state’s $16 billion shortfall

Yes, you should remember these names.

Why? These are 17 people who got off their respective couches and made the effort to run a successful political to convince the majority of the electorate (who still bother to vote) to elect them to office where they can and do propose legislation that will impact firearms owners. In contrast, the pro-2A community either stayed home and did not run for office and/or figure out how to convince the majority of the voting electorate to vote for them.

Political apathy and lack of political/civic engagement by the pro-2A community is what would make Jefferson throw up.

3 Likes

…Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah! and here we go again another ‘County’ heard from

SSDD !

2 Likes

No Wait, I take that back, ( Blah, Blah etc etc)

I REALLY want to know something Mark.
Answer me TRUE
Do you REALLY think this BS you are spouting?
Do you REALLY think that we 2 A’s sit on our duffs and NOT VOTE?
We’re NOT involved in Politic’s and our Communities?
Do you REALLY think these folk’s you (and I) listed are a POSITIVE FORCE FOR OUR COUNTRY?
Installing MORE Gun restrictions and stupid A-- Laws to INFRIGE on our RIGHT to keep and bear arms?
REALLY?
SERIOUSLY?
If you feel this way what the he!! are you doing here?
Answer me honestly
Hopefully you are not already composing your same tired drivel, anti 2A spiel
and form an honest answer for a change
It’s the same same garbage with you folk’s
You obviously don’t like it here
Are you PAID to disrupt and antagonize?
Are you a Basement dwelling Keyboard Warrior?
OR IN REALITY ARE YOU A FAILED POLITICIAN WHO WHEN YOU STEPPED UP GOT Slapped by people who thought you’d get support from?
The same tired drivel like Gabby Giffords
Michael Bloomberg
Soweto Barry and Big Mike the dyke!

You’d rather tear us down than build anything

4 Likes

The facts are …

Anti-2A politicians ran for office and won. They are proposing and passing laws that will affect those of us who own firearms. These are real people who took real action in the real world.

Pro-2A people, on the other hand, either did not run for office or could not figure out how to assemble a majority of voters to vote against the anti-2A politicians who ran for and won office.

Grousing from the sidelines is a pointless exercise until and unless it becomes a winning political campaign.

3 Likes

Haven’t read any of the words yet. I’m still looking at the pretty picture. :nerd_face:

4 Likes

I moved to Wash. State in 1978. Walked in to my County Sheriff’s office and walked out 10 minutes later with my non-expiring CC permit. Oh how the great have fallen!

5 Likes

Just what was posted, so much wrong the libs are proposing in WA.

I thought MI was bad but you got us beat

4 Likes

Define “affect”. An additional 11% tax has no affect? Restricting where someone can go has no affect? Restricting someone’s ability to purchase enough ammo to practice has no affect? Come on.

As for the whole “winning political campaign” nonsense, as a lifetime resident of CA, Democrats will always get elected because they have a “D” next to their name on the ballot and it’s always Democrats who propose :poop: laws like this. And any Democrat who doesn’t tow the party line on this kind of crap gets primaried out. Trying to run a political campaign against politicians like this is the least effective use of resources. The money pumped into a campaign would be better spent in the courts, fighting this crap.

5 Likes

Thanks Robert1246
Looking forward to serving for you and the community and with you. It’s not a gun problem it’s a matter of the heart (liberal idealism)
Praise The Lord and keep your powder dry

3 Likes

Okay, I finished drooling over the picture and looked at the words.

One thing I don’t understand with laws about limiting ammo purchases and adding an additional 11% tax on firearms, ammo, and parts, is that it should be an easy win in the courts wrt “well regulated”. “Well regulated” means well trained and well equipped. Excessive taxation and limits on ammo purchases is the exact opposite of what the 2A describes as, “being necessary to the security of a free State”. These court cases should be easy wins. Anything that gets in the way of me being well regulated is an unconstitutional infringement.

5 Likes

I’ve wondered why western Washington wants to become part of the great state of Idaho….now I know.

5 Likes

You speak my language. Bless the Lord.

2 Likes

@Darrell63 Welcome sir. And you are most correct, our lives/hobbies/careers are all at risk of government, or some virtual signaler within, to decide they need to tell us how to live and we are in the sh1t hole yet again. 1/20/25 cannot get here fast enough.

2 Likes

SO, I ASSUME THAT EVERYONE HERE FINANCIALLY SUPPORTS PRO-GUN ORGANIZATION, PLEASE NOT THE nra, BUT THE SAF OR GOA??,

Why do only the very few carry the water in protecting our gun rights? Anyone reading this that does not pay up, your F welcome.

2 Likes

Thanks for the welcome to the community hope to chat with you again soon

3 Likes

I’m sure many here will remember when JFK was assassinated and Gun Control became a reality with the '68 Gun Control Act. One of the “tenets” of this act was to stop gun violence. Look at society today, has any gun control legislation actually reduced crime? Criminals will always find ways to get weapons illegally and use them to commit crimes. Any sensible person knows that only law-abiding citizens follow the law. But what if a criminal knew that citizens were armed and would defend themselves?

I truly believe that politicians only promote gun control legislation for one reason. It is more about CONTROL than gins.

4 Likes