What an interesting case story and legal case study.
What a teachable moment/case.
USCCA has offered some local in person/live free legal seminars. I went to one, I thought it was well done and would encourage everyone to attend at least one; And check out their books on sale.
I admit I don’t know all of the facts in this case.
Part of it suggests, he who fired, fired at a “plow” that was hitched on the truck. If so, why? Is that a bad idea and why? If the plow is curved, may that cause a bullet to ricochet and hit an innocent and or the self-defender/gun handler himself?
Mike164 who posted this subject - included in their title, Poor Gun Handling.
Another point was someone claimed the truck was moving away from the self-defender when shots were fired; If so, would that be a wrongful act on part of the man who fired?
Where was the man who fired when he shot? Was he still in his car, confined and cornered, with no way out, or was he already outside of his vehicle, standing where he could have walked or ran out of the way? Or might there still have been someone in the car at risk, he was protecting?
Accuracy:
Other posts had talked about this importance. If one really likes a firearm, for its beauty and art, but if it’s not accurate, perhaps keep it, but not as one’s EDC nor go-to for home defense; But instead find an EDC that works best for you and is most accurate for you? And, train, practice, learn, & to be accurate. I went from poor to good in accuracy, it can be done.
The aftermath:
I once heard one say “You’re responsible for each bullet that leaves your gun”. That means including the ones that do not hit the perpetrator. That’s probably partly why some laws in high population cities are so strict, because when a bullet misses a perp, it has more chance to strike an innocent.
I heard another reputable person say “Plan on losing your job”; if you ever have to fire in self defense. As our employers will read about you in the news, and won’t tolerate your risk to their rep. Sad of course. Those employers who would not punish, kudos to them!
In this case story, it seems the case will go on, there is chance prosecutors will try again. Not sure if there will be any civil claims against the man, as opposed to criminal. Two very different but real legal risks. The man seems to now be undergoing seeking his standing back in society who has judged him already.
And folks, this case was in Utah, I think not known as an anti gun state. So imagine, how the courts and society would rule and act in less friendly states.
It brings to question, without me trying to judge him, but it brings to light, the level of wisdom of when to shoot, and how to shoot, and when not to. I think realistically, any one person’s actions reflects upon how our greater firearm rights community is perceived, whether we like it or not; And that we each have a responsibility to train ourselves and one another. In doing so it strengthens our cause. Someone else posted a topic about “morals”; Might it be our moral responsibility to learn and teach?
Get insured, if you’re not.