Oregon? Not California!

Oregon is facing a ballot initiative, IP28, that could criminalize hunting, fishing, and other animal-use practices if it qualifies and passes, but it has not yet become law.

affecting not only recreational hunters and anglers but also farmers, ranchers, commercial fishermen, pest control operators, veterinarians, and even tribal members exercising treaty rights The initiative would also impact livestock breeding practices, scientific research involving animals, and animal husbandry procedures such as dehorning or castration. Approximately one million Oregonians could face criminal liability under the proposed law.
As of early June 2026, proponents of IP28 have submitted over 126,000 signatures, surpassing the 117,173 valid signatures required to qualify for the ballot, though verification is still pending.

6 Likes

I’m surprised CA didn’t think about it first.

8 Likes

I think it is like a competition with California and Washington, trying to make a name for themselves.

10 Likes

At least, CA still has this: “Los Angeles mayoral candidate and City Councilmember Nithya Raman proposed an emergency ban on backyard barbecues and open flame cooking during high-risk “Red Flag Warning” days to reduce wildfire dangers.”

5 Likes

Yup. A race to the bottom of civilization.

10 Likes

We need to cut those three states off and let them slip back into the Pacific and be done with all this silliness.

10 Likes

Ban ALL FLY SWATTERS!! No More RAID!!! OFF? Nope mosquitos need love too!!!

7 Likes

This is not going to pass and even if by some miracle it did the Governor would veto it in a heartbeat. The state needs recreational hunting and fishing along with commercial fishing and ranching to generate tax revenue to maintain the state parks.

5 Likes

Oregon is far north California :grinning_face:

7 Likes

It looks like Washington and California got divorced and are in a custody dispute over Oregon

7 Likes

Yeah, but who is/are the idiot or idiots in power who would even consider something like this to be a good idea? These are clearly not rational representatives of the people.

6 Likes

Read this and laugh.

From the link:
IP28 would also expand protections against animal sexual assault by classifying both the masturbation and impregnation of animals as sexual assault even when done for agricultural purposes (under current state law, the same actions would only count as sexual assault if done for the human being’s sexual gratification).

Who knew this was such a large issue in Oregon, but it does explains some things!

6 Likes

Judge- why do you need to carry a gun?
Defendant- for agricultural purposes!

7 Likes

PETA and several other Animal Rights groups put up $300,000 to get the signatures. Think about it though they literally paid about $3 a signature and the people who gathered the signatures probably said something like, “do you want to prevent animal cruelty in Oregon sign this”.

5 Likes

:flushed_face::flushed_face::flushed_face: Other than a few short summers at my grandpa’s farm, I don’t know much about agricultural practices. So, I got my “education” from episodes of The Ranch and Yellowstone.

4 Likes

This is a practice that is very common for stallions and bulls when dealing with show or sport animals. It’s done to prevent injury to the mare or cow. When an animal is worth more than their meat you want to protect it. I dated a girl in college who gave hand jobs to stallions for this purpose.

4 Likes

The governess has the brains of a snail, she’d sign anything put in front of her by the blue haired freaks in Portland. She signed a $4B tax increase before getting crushed by the voters demanding it be put on the ballot, then she asked the court if she could “un-sign” the bill, she’s THAT stupid.

8 Likes

Probably the same idiots the 126,000 constituents who signed the petition voted for.

4 Likes

A: it’s not going to pass.

B: The governor has already said she will not support it:

2 Likes