Advice of counsel
Without proper signage, am I responsible if my pet eats terrorist with gun upon breaking into my home? How about no trespassing signs, alarm signs, no soliciting signs. All signs are a form of deterrence! Lights and cameras are meant to be deterrents. Isn’t that the point?
This has gone totally upside down. I totally understand “We don’t call 911, w/image of 1911.
Seriously, can you protect yourself or not?
Prosecutors, prosecute ham sandwiches. I don’t see them holding any of today’s criminals liable for anything! But because I warn you I have a dog I’m liable???
Let’s take this to the extreme. My 14’ pet anaconda, affectionately known as “Slippy” is allowed to roam freely in my home. While I’m asleep, stupid breaks into my home quietly. “Slippy” silently wraps around “stupids” neck and squeezes him to death. Am I responsible for directing “Slippy” to kill “stupid”? “Slippy” by nature is a man eater (stupid men) and stupid is as stupid does! How am I seriously considered liable when stupid breaks into my castle?
Someone breaks into my home with the intent to harm, I identify threat, I “intend” to stop threat!”
It’s almost to the point being alive can be used against you!