Some people keep bringing it up. 
Thatâs just Twisted Brother BRUCEâŠ
(I like that!)
No offense to any of the upstanding. righteous Lawyers on here, but generally lawyers suck!
This vermin is a prime example of a self serving, conceded POSâs that try to make a buck by tainting somebody else. they canât make it on their own merits, they have to try and dismantle the competition.
Like anything else you have to use your own discernment and choose (to the best of your ability) what works for YOU!. When I took the CCNM course it was âhostedâ by Law Shieldâ (I already was with USCCA)
These people were nasty explaining the differences between each groupâŠyou donât have to be nasty trying to get new clients/members. That just turned me off straight away and I unwittingly became a VOICE for USCCA by telling the âclassâ that!. Itâs Cheese-dik Tactics to dis the competition. If you live and die on your own merits thatâs the way the world rewarded you for being a stand-up, straight forward, HONEST Company. Law Shield spent MORE TIME DISSING US than touting what they had to offerâŠstupid. After I was done the âInstructorâ told me âIf you donât want to join us then you are free to leaveâ⊠I said something like I paid to be here, I earned that spot in this chair and you can just F-off and teach the class what we are supposed to know and end this idiot infomercial! Some never came back for the second dayâs class. Some asked me about USCCA afterwards. Itâs tactics like this that make me sick to my stomach sometimes and these âLesserâ companies STILL bash US on you-tub!
Generations of idiots are being raised now to get as much as they can by doing as little as possible to earn it. Common sense is gone!. .Gov has inserted itself into every facet of our lives and citizens donât realize there is a price to pay for all their .gov freebies, weaponized Law enforcement and dismantlement of their RIGHTS and freedoms. Sorry, I took a hard right on Tangent road again!
About this Topic⊠Thatâs just stupid, and thatâs all I have to say about that!
Please, by all means, tell us how you really feel. 
Thank you brother I will.
Every time someone starts talking about how bad the USCCA is, it ends up being nothing.
I do know this my Brother.
Thank you Sir for bringing this Topic/Issue forward.
I was NEVER bashing youâŠEVER. I am just tired of âDirty tacticsâ.
New members are impressionable and could be swayed by the darkside!
Come and stay with the USCCAâŠWe have cookies! 
Yum chocolate chip!
Law Shield has Madolains! 
USCCA canceled the coverage as soon as she was charged with obstruction of justice, that alone disqualified her because she was lying to the police.
But isnât that what the trial is for? If this is true then the USCCA is the one deciding guilt or innocence! This has been my point from the beginning! Which leads to my second question: would they sue to get their money back if youâre innocent but found guilty?
The insurer should cover regardless. Iâm not saying to go out and plan to commit a crime but if the insurer thinks they donât have a case how well will they defend you?
I do not believe that USCCA is going after Kayla Giles for the money sent.
Light a fire in the middle of your Livingroom and try to collect on your homeownerâs insurance!
But that has nothing to do with the OP topic. Why muddy the water?
I donât want a beat the dead horse thread. At the same time my pea sized brain says this does not compute. From what I can filter out of this thread and the other one; USCCA appears to be the best answer for legal coverage. I have become cynical in my older years not trusting any but my immediate family and some of them only for 5â (how far I can toss them).
When it comes to my freedom and trusting insurers: hold out both hands, crap in one and wish in the other. Then see which one fills up the quickest.
OP = Original Poster.
Planning a murder and self defense two different topics.
IMO
George Carlin had a bit in his routine where âAmericaâs number one domestically sold product is bulls#it.â And all those singers and bands whoâve covered âHeard it Through the Grapevineâ urged us to âBelieve half of what you see, son, and none of what you hear.â
Someone is suing the fast food chains right now because the hamburgers and tacos you get donât look like the hamburgers and tacos in the advertisements.
This is a great country for sowing mistrust and reaping cynicism. Read the fine print.
And how did USCCA conclude she was planning a murder before the trial was over?
I think thatâs what people are concerned about. Her original attorney (the one representing her before USCCA yanked the coverage) thought it was a solid self-defense case. At which point does USCCA decide (and how) that a self-defense incident is a non-covered criminal act and they are getting out? Whatâs the standard?
People these days are being charged with obstruction of justice for all kind of BS reasons. Do I understand correctly that being charged is enough for USCCA to drop the coverage? If that is really the case then I have a really hard time understanding what I am paying for.
It is not.
Sorry if it has to be repeated. DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE!