That is the unethical money hungry attorneys going after the deep pockets for a big payday schemers at work there, just because they can.
Some are always targeting all in sight indiscriminately to get whatever they can, from whoever they can regardless of who actually is the bad guy.
Like the gang bangers who want to scar their enemies making a big spectacle spraying a huge amount of ammunition around.
Or, who loaned his gun to someone who acted negligently because the doer has no money to go after but, that gun’s owner has a house, and other assets to be had.
They don’t care who pays, only that someone does, preferably who has the most to pay, or as many as they can get to pay.
Whatever buys their next vacation, car(s), or both. Or, pays their kids college tuition.
Gabby is such a tool of the Democrats. But she has to stir the pot now that Republicans are in control. Her comments on X have become irrelevant as she continues to name drop and grease the palms of congressional leaders. While we shouldn’t ignore her actions, we should question what she does with those donations. They certainly aren’t stopping gun violence in S-hole cities like Chicago and Oakland.
Let’s hope the thread stays as it is more specific and brings to bear one of the primary reasons (The Giffords) why people bow before these gun control advocates.
This is why I’ve said and have written my elected officials to pass a law that simply states that a plaintiff, government or private, brings any suit against a defendant and loses, they are responsible for all the defendants cost’s including attorneys, lost wages and other court and private expenses. They would also be forbidden from attempting a similar case against any other person or company or corporation; violation would result in the lawyer and the corporation they work for permanently losing their license to practice law.
I believe that after Jan. 20th these ‘Frivolous’ Law Suits disappear.
THERE IS A CLEAR AGENDA HERE THAT IS EVIL
The Disarming of our Nation is the ONLY reason for these suits and the
.gov Over ruling trying to put FFL’s, Ranges, and Firearms manufactures
out of business.
Just look to Australia (where their .gov is not done! They’ve disarmed it’s Citizens yet they continue to enact MORE LAWS AND RESTRICTIONS till the people won’t be able to do anything except what their .gov say’s is ALLOWED.
IF you think that can’t happen here you’re not paying attention.
Mom’s without common sense
Gifford’s
Brady bill and on and on are all backed by Michael Bloomberg (who is the toady for George Soros. Soros is a NAZI through and through and if you think I’m being harsh
look him up. (I use to say Google it boot!) But now I feel anybody using Google is ‘Tracked’ now so please avoid if you can.
They really think they have this ‘wired’, that every Law suit will work for them (i.e: GUN CONTROL) What this does in my mind is it drains these manufactures of Needed funds to operate and exist–Lawyers fee’s will raise the prices of their products and WE THE PEOPLE will eventually not be able to afford them. (that is their hope) Well, so sorry Socialists, ‘Hope don’t float!’ It is our RIGHT to own Firearms and Protect ourselves. You can’t just Sue that RIGHT away.
Gifford’s is bought and paid for by the anti gun establishment, Her Campaigns took the (30) pieces of silver, almost getting dead by a Gun was the GUNS fault, not her Left leaning Policies…(it’s never about their policies amirite?)
Australia, Canada, Great Britain, they’re all doing the same thing.
All those leftists in the US fail to understand basic rights, what really contributes to crime, and the simple fact that if they actually succeed in putting firearms and ammo manufacturers out of business, they’re making it harder and harder for the police, military and their own personal protection to still be properly armed.
Contrary to their twisted beliefs, 1. The firearms industry as a whole is a relatively tiny industry, without a lot of cash. I remember researching this a while back on a different thread. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but Apple made more money in a day than Smith and Wesson made in a year, or something like that. 2. Gun laws do absolutely nothing to reduce violent crime. I’ve looked and looked. There seems to be no honest study, and nothing I could put together, to correlate strict gun laws with reduced murder or violent crime in general.
They want their people armed, just not the rest of us. Well, when Glock, SW, Sig and Ruger are all gone, where are their police going to get arms? Oh, right, they de-funded their police!!!
You are wise beyond your years friend.
IF (and it will never happen) IF they used as much energy in tackling Crime
the Cartels, Illegal Immigration, .gov corruption we wouldn’t be where we are today.
The sad fact (and I may be beating a dead horse (again)–Go for Karacal’s dead horse meme) They just don’t think clearly.
SOCIALISM/Communism, Marxism simple doesn’t work. It never has and never will. IF you think (and they clearly don’t) YOU CAN CONTROL A FREE SOCIETY…YOU ALREADY LOST! IF you look at the other countries around the Globe who have disarmed their people–list too long to point out. You will see .gov sponsored ANARCHY. NICE!. Ask the Brit’s how that worked out for them. And soon ask the Cartels, Terrorists, Gangs, Psycho’s and .gov how they fared when we are done cleansing this Nation.
To simply say THE CONSTITUTION ISN’T ABSOLUTE you already LOST.
Giffords, Bloomberg and their ilk will be a distant bad memory when all is said and done.
She is following what the greedy,crooked governor of Illinois is trying.
State is broke and needs cash from somewhere si instead of thinking about all the wrong ideas they tried, go after a manufacture that has nothing to do with them.
Typical democratic thinking to blame something or someone else for their own stupidity.
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005, that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. Both arms manufacturers and dealers can still be held liable for damages resulting from defective products, breach of contract, criminal misconduct, and other actions for which they are directly responsible. However, they may be held liable for negligent entrustment if it is found that they had reason to believe a firearm was intended for use in a crime.
Welcome back Mark!
You’re right where your supposed to be.
Correctamundo! Brother, They NEVER look @ their past Failures and try to do better in the future.
They NEVER see the BIG PICTURE! (They are supposed to be serving US and not enrich themselves!)
Everyone of these Left Wing Wacko’s is a Millionaire (@ least)
Thomas Jefferson I believe said that ‘Serving the People’ is a short term deal, You do your Service and then get out of Politics’. SAY NO TO CAREER POLITICIANS.
As for this Woman (Giffords) I try to be kind and not speak ILL of the Brain Dead but she did get shot in the head. Maybe she has an excuse the other Lefty’s don’t have, or maybe that shot didn’t affect her at all. Who knows?. But she defiantly took the (30) pieces of silver from the Gun Grabbers and that is unforgivable.
This whole Disarmament of WE THE PEOPLE will fail
It just now wastes the money of the Gunner’s, the Gun Companies and only the Lawyers get rich!
Shameful.