Gather peacefully and respectfully and armed outside polling stations in January's runoff election

Staying 150 feet away, stand through the night, in shifts (organize support for hot beverages/snacks), in case poll watchers complain of being blocked from observing, or are intimidated and bullied, or removed by force. Then instantly shut the polling station down until LEGAL OPERATIONS can be reestablished. This election must NOT be stolen again!! In case of screeching about “voter suppression” again, this will NOT take place during voting hours (so no possibility of suppression!) but will be an overnight vigil to ensure the integrity of the counting. Do this all over Georgia. There may be a violent response by anti-American agitators. Everything on our side must stay civil and will be and will remain legal, including acting to defend the election by maintaining the status quo ante the onset of illegal, unconstitutional activity, BY ANYONE, to interfere with the legally-mandated processes of counting of ballots. Make sure we have our own video teams to record events throughout the night!

4 Likes

No proof has been submitted to a court that shows any election fraud. Trump’s own AG and election security officials said this was the most secure election ever undertaken. The only thing that ever was accepted was that the observers could stand a little closer.

Just because Trump and his acolytes say something doesn’t make it true.

2 Likes

I stand by my statement.

6 Likes

Ignoring it doesnt make it not real either… just saying.

7 Likes

… and search any trucks on the way in (USPS or otherwise)??

6 Likes

… and search the internet traffic to the Dominion machines.
Forget it, multilayer election fraud infrastructure is in place, people who are willing to be fooled are in place. Moreover, the world sees all this, MSM cant deceive our enemies foreign, and they will use it to their advantage.

5 Likes

Probably because no actual court has been willing to even accept the case. The ones which were approached were afraid to look at any evidence. Supreme Court included.

Unfortunately, that means that there may be a different form of adjudication.

I find it INTERESTING that, at least, Trump is trying to go through available systems. When he runs out of options, though…

8 Likes

A lot of the cases were dismissed due to procedural issues not because of a lack of evidence.

7 Likes

What I have seen, the cases got dismissed without a hearing for:

Lack of “standing”
and
Lack of timely submission

No federal court has chosen to see any evidence, unless I have missed something. Anyone?

2 Likes
3 Likes

There is plenty of evidence of fraud. You won’t see it with your eyes closed. I didn’t think anyone believed the narrative they’re forcing down our throats but you have surprised me.

5 Likes

Are you kidding me? There was a crap ton of video evidence all over the place of election fraud. The only reason why you don’t believe it is because you listen to mainstream media. Mainstream media is not covering it because they’re a part of it. WAKE UP MAN!!! They cheated right in front of everybody’s eyes. How can you say there was no proof. The proof was everywhere.

4 Likes

No evidence has been presented in a court of law, and the lawyers have had to tell the judges that they don’t have any evidence when they are under oath. EVEN when presenting to a Trump appointed judge.

Wake up, your being played for money to personally enrich trump.

2 Likes

Affidavits are not evidence?
Witness testimony are not evidence?
CC TV video with suitcases are not evidence?

I am sorry, there has been plenty of evidence, and plenty of evidence that the evidence been presented in the court of law. I am not sure if you exclusively watch CNN, but perhaps you need to change the channel.

The only evidence not presented, due to its newness, is forensic analysis of Dominion software with conclusion it was designed for fraud.

4 Likes

Ok, no credible evidence.

BTW, DOJ and FBI concluded the same.

2 Likes

Which part of the suitcase being carted from under the table, after observers have been chased out is NOT credible?
Did you personally see the video, and did you personally find it not credible? Did you personally hear witness testimony and find it not credible? It was in the news.

To declare the evidence credible or incredible requires the court to consider it. Which is difficult if the court refuses to take the case, isn’t it? Do you think, between the affidavits, testimony, video there is enough for the court to be obligated to consider the case?

As far as opinion of the FBI, the place where Peter Strzok, Bob Mueller and Jim Comey were employed – it may be the “opinion” of a few powerful higher ups.
At any rate, who do you expect -not just me, but America - to believe, our own eyes, or FBI or DOJ?

4 Likes

Once a person had determined to believe something, it is pointless to continue a discussion.

4 Likes

@Stephen22 Something to ponder:

https://banned.video/watch?id=5fdbd42f460db90800f79737)

2 Likes

Passions are high around the election situation, please remember to abide by the Community Guidelines of respectful conversation. No name-calling or personal attacks will be tolerated.

We’re not asking anyone to agree, we are requiring respectful comments.

There payed off. Just like the media!!! They are being paid by the socialist!!! By George Soros and China and all of them. You are letting the mainstream media poison your mind. They are going to infringe on our constitutional rights. I take that back. They are infringing on our constitutional rights. Your hearing false news. They do have proof. But hey, you want to life your life blinded and lied to… Go ahead, it’s your right. I sir will not live that way.

2 Likes