11 Likes
I am not sure if this is a good thing. It might be a good thing Trump was trying to do. What will the next administration use it for? To me it is a two-headed monster. Less government is a good government.
6 Likes
Wtf?
Your algorithm realized youāve been a massive troll and should post something pro gun?
For once I agree with your post though, Iām cautiously optimistic about this move, while being fearful of what the left may distort it into.
9 Likes
Donāt fall for āOppenheimerā GC pulling a Fettermanā¦
4 Likes
You guys are such Muppets. Oh look, I am starting trouble again. Let me hit you with facts. This might hurt, but I have always been pro-gun. You guys are so busy making shiat up about me you forget to read. Maybe it is back to the reading comprehension thing with you guys that we have talked about on numerous occasions.
You really, really should refrain from these characterizations. Unless you want me to continually embarrass you. In a game of who is the real ass again, or do you just enjoy the abuse? It doesnāt make me feel good to point out your deficits.
I donāt see this as just a left issue; it is a person issue. It doesnāt matter what letter is in front of their name if they want to take rights.
1 Like
Letās seeā¦office of gun rights run by the federal govt under Bondiā¦..what could go wrong???
6 Likes
I haz a questionā¦. (2 actually)
-
Will it be staffed?
-
Who will staff it?
If this was the Rancid Pudding administration (read: Obummerās third term) I would be leery this wasnāt any extension of Sorosā 3.0 Gun Grab.
As it is like Joel stated the jury is still out with who we have in the DOJ right now.
I would have thought that after (11) LONG months the Constitution, 2A, and other āRIGHTSā already trampled on, Stripped from us, some maybe never to be seen againā¦would have been a Stronger PRIORITY!ā¦but thatās prolly just me being āpickyāā¦.
5 Likes
The problem with the term āGun Rightsā is inanimate object donāt have rights. Only People have Rights.
7 Likes
4 Likes
Hereās ya a Root Beer 
my Bad you put this up it must have been da Gummies lol 
Love ya Brother Cal Bobby Jean and Debbie ann twofeathers Sir
In my state driving is a privilege not a right. Thatās why they can make any requirement the state wants to. But our right to bear arms is guaranteed by constitutional right. So we shouldnāt need any state permission.
5 Likes
Yep, driving on the highway, weāre operating a vehicle on roadways owned and maintained by our governments, so those governments do have the logical ability to regulate whom operates what on the public roads. Having said that, you have a right to operate pretty much whatever you dammed well please on your own property. Want to drive recklessly in Grave Digger around your back 40? Go for it, itās your right! Want to do the same on I-95? Nope. That all makes perfect sense.
We do not need a license to speak. We do not need a license to write stuff, or publish it, or to worship our God, or to assemble. We do not need a āprivacy licenseā to keep our private lives private. Why the phuck do people think we need a license to defend our own lives? We have an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
6 Likes
Not yet
4 Likes
And this is where things break down when a parasitic and violent god asserts themselves.
Which is why we also have separation of church and state.
Worship your parasite god, but the second you bring your religion into governance, you should be disbarred from office.
3 Likes
separation of church and state is NOT in the Constitution or Bill of Rights IIRCā¦
the phrase was taken from a letter Jefferson wrote to some concerned folks afraid that as in Europeā¦
they would be required to adopt and worship under an official state religionā¦
they reply was there was NO official state religionā¦ they were free to practice their ownā¦
also sure does SEEM like so very many ignore as hard as they can the free exercise portion of the 1stā¦
Will_B you are free to NOT worship as you see fitā¦ as all are free to worship as they see fitā¦
public office or notā¦ are they somehow forcing their religion on you in some way?
and I remind youā¦ our Constitution and Bill of Rights as well as the public morals you grew up underā¦
are Bible based in many waysā¦ or do you prefer a sharia based culture or any other for that matter?
parasitic? interesting statement care to elaborate on just how itās parasiticā¦
May God Bless Youā¦
Firstly, I was not attacking Christianity in particular, just that our elected representatives should keep their gods out of their civic duties.
And parasitic, yes, there is a certain religious system that is in fact waging war against the foundation of our society.
well here is the thing from my point of viewā¦ humansā¦ manā¦ NOT GODā¦
anytime in history the parasitic types have warped or lied about things to make more moneyā¦
call it greed if you likeā¦ or lust for power or whateverā¦ unscrupulous types get involved andā¦
away they goā¦ the church is all too often compromised/corrupted by such peopleā¦
as to certain religious systems waging war against the foundation of our societyā¦
I can only think of one that is active right nowā¦
and again I point out the foundation of our society is Biblical basedā¦
this can be seen by reading what they wroteā¦ the wording is specific to suchā¦
the freedom and liberty you have now to attack or disparage religion is proofā¦
sadly all that we have and are allowedā¦ is NOT soā¦ in many other countriesā¦
go o jail for posting something on the netā¦ here no problem there not so muchā¦
example try those things in a Islamic countryā¦ or even in some areas of Europe right now
so few understand or appreciate what the haveā¦
3 Likes