I have posted this same image on other Rittonhouse threads
10 Likes
This case is not about 2nd amendment rights⊠The kid illegally takes a AR-15 rifle crosses state line⊠Goes to a Riot/Demonstration where there is a lot of anger and craziness going on⊠Rittenhouse shoots 3, kills twoâŠKid should have never had the rifle in his possession going into a volatile situation⊠Plain ass stupid⊠Should get the lesser charge of ManslaughterâŠ
1 Like
Facts be damnedâŠ
5 Likes
@Nelson20 Please stop repeating the lies and fake news, Just like the McCloskeyâs his arrest is all about the 2A and defending your self against the mob. 
7 Likes
What is actually âfake newsâ ??? Your version of the truth !! Again as stated; a 17 yr. old kid, had no business bringing a weapon illegally in possession across state lines to a riot, and mixing it up with the crowd⊠If it was my son, I wouldnât have allowed him to do itâŠ.
I think the point was he did not bring the weapon across state lines, he obtained the weapon in Wisconsin.
6 Likes
Ignore list updated.
7 Likes
The weapon was not brought illegally across state lines. Kyle only held it legally in Wisconsin at all times. Kyle could legally possess the rifle while in Wisconsin. Openly carrying a loaded rifle in Wisconsin is legal.
He was there to help put out fires and provide medical aid if necessary. He has a legal right to defend himself during the Good Samaritan acts that he went there to do.
Please watch the actual trial in its entirety because you are spreading misinformation.
7 Likes
I started a well thought out statement, but itâs obvious I canât reason with a rock.
1 Like
If this trial teaches you anything, it should be abundantly clear that the District Attorneys will distort your shooting incident and turn it into a massive trial with $$$ legal expenses to prove them wrong.
5 Likes
Perhaps a little clarification.
7 Likes
How much deliberation is needed in this case? What the heck is so debatable, that it takes 3 days. I honestly donât see it. Unless some jurors are scared and unable to give their vote.
3 Likes
I would be very concerned. Wouldnât you? Wouldnât anyone? Especially after the media tried to publish photos of jurors.
5 Likes
Itâs thuggery, intimidating the jury.
âGive us what we want or weâll burn you city downâ (again)
4 Likes
Jury is done for the day, again. 
@4:15 pm central.
2 Likes
No doubt. Not just themselves, family, we have heard threats from these terrorists before. Who will protect them? Nether local cops, not the state, nor DOJ have made a single statement in support of the due process. The only hope, seems like, is the Rittenhouse-type of citizen.
4 Likes
You may have seen this:
4 Likes
Then having the DA point the AR at the jury and people in the courtroom, which last I knew was called brandishing. Who will be prosecuting him?
Also, in the story, it mentioned him taking a photo with the Proud Boys, as proof of his being a white supremicist. I believe it is difficult for an organization run by a black Cuban-American (Enrique Tarrio) to be a white supremicist group.