And you failed to understand my posts. I covered that already, where I stated once the situation devolved where one’s life is endangered or gross bodily harm is likely, then one is legally justified in using lethal force.
I do care about my car, and I had my first new one stolen as a young adult. I discussed that on this thread. However, again, one is not typically justified in use of lethal force for a property crime. You appear to be the one suffering from reading comprehension issues. You malign yourself when using projection to attempt to insult others.
You appear to be trolling for someone to agree with you on using lethal force for a property crime, but as you have seen repeatedly, as peaceable citizens, we do not believe in harming others. We seek only to avoid or de-escalate conflicts, and will only use lethal force as it is intended to be used - as a last resort to defend self and family against the threat of loss of life or gross bodily harm.