New ATF Rule Will Allow Firearms to be Shipped to Your Door

ATF’s proposed non-over-the-counter transfer rule could allow same-state FFLs to complete firearm sales remotely and ship guns directly to qualified buyers after identity verification, Form 4473, and NICS requirements are satisfied. img Travis Pike

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has unveiled a new proposed rule that will allow firearms to be shipped directly to the door of gun buyers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The rule, titled “Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements” (Docket No. ATF-2026-0266; RIN 1140-AB05), is sure to rattle the cages of the anti-gun lobby. It was added to the Federal Register today and is scheduled to be published tomorrow.

The proposed rule would expand non-over-the-counter (NOTC) firearms transfers by Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). Currently, buyers must purchase their Gun Control Act (GCA) firearms in person from dealers. Under the new rule, dealers in the same state as the buyer will be allowed to sell and ship firearms directly to customers without requiring them to visit a physical store.

ADVERTISEMENT

The rule will permit FFLs to remotely verify the buyer’s identity using approved methods.

Gun stores must use identity proofing and authentication that meet NIST SP 800-63-4 standards. This includes Identity Assurance Level 2 (IAL2) for initial proofing, which requires strong validation of identity evidence such as a driver’s license or passport, combined with binding via video, biometrics, or other approved methods. Returning customers can use Authentication Assurance Level 2 (AAL2), which includes multi-factor authentication (MFA).

The buyer must submit an ATF Form 4473 and a copy of a government-issued photo ID to the dealer. The FFL must then conduct a video conference to visually compare the buyer to their ID. The buyer completes the remote identity proofing and authentication through a Credential Service Provider (CSP) that meets NIST standards. Once verified, the FFL runs the buyer through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).
After the NICS check, the standard 7-day waiting period and Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) notification (via mail or electronic means) still apply, along with normal recordkeeping requirements. FFLs remain responsible for ensuring their chosen CSP complies with the standards; the rule does not mandate any specific provider.

This change aligns with the plain language of the Gun Control Act (18 U.S.C. § 922(c)), which has authorized non-over-the-counter sales since 1968 (with a 2024 update allowing electronic CLEO notifications) without limiting them to NICS-exempt transactions. The ATF argues that the Brady Act’s NICS and identity verification requirements (18 U.S.C. § 922(t)) do not prohibit remote verification.

Technological advancements since the 1993 Brady Act now make secure remote verification possible, similar to methods already used by other agencies, such as the IRS, with ID.me. The goal of the rule is to increase flexibility and access for lawful buyers without compromising safety.

NOTC transfers are already common for National Firearms Act (NFA) items such as suppressors. Many companies maintain networks of in-state FFLs that receive NFA items and then mail them directly to the buyer’s door after approval. These networks are well established, and there is no reason companies like Palmetto State Armory (PSA) could not use similar processes for standard GCA firearms.

In addition to greater flexibility for buyers and FFLs, the rule will particularly benefit gun owners in remote rural areas or those unable to travel. It allows the entire process to be completed online, eliminating the need to visit a physical gun shop. The ATF estimates significant deregulatory savings of $103.7 million annualized over 10 years. There are minimal direct costs to the government or FFLs, as use of the service is voluntary and any transaction fees can be passed on to buyers.

The public comment period will run for 90 days after publication in the Federal Register. Comments can be submitted via regulations.gov or by mail. This rule coordinates with a separate proposed rule revising ATF Form 4473 (Docket No. ATF-2026-0001; ATF 2025R-01P).

12 Likes

That’s one small step for the 2A…

13 Likes

Love the concept! Spineless Republicans will never vote on it and the corrupt democraps will have the “Blood running in the streets” BS to have the support to stop it.

Plus I prefer to wrap my paws around it before I leave the store with it.

9 Likes

Even if this passes, I’m betting that the blue states will pass some other law preventing it from happening.

And then it will be stuck in the courts for years, and I’ll never get to take advantage of it before I die.

11 Likes

And what about a waiting period? Do they not ship it for three days,…. Or am I just not supposed to use it for three days?

If it’s only permissible via “in state” FFL, I’ll just pick it up in store and save the risk of FedEx UPS or Amazon loosing my gun for me.

Those of us who work in the small package shipping industry know what a gun case looks like! Damage and theft are very real risks.

8 Likes

Here is what I consider a potentially interesting true story.

I returned a pistol to Springfield Armory for warranty work. I discussed I had travel plans both on the phone and in writing prior to the return. I was assured they would not return it to me without contacting me to confirm I would not be out of town. Sure enough I got an email telling me it had been shipped with a tracking number. It was scheduled to be delivered while I was out of town. I immediately called and they confirmed the check was already in the mail.

I could have asked someone to pick it up for me, but we all know a porch pirate could pick it up between the time I got a delivery notice and a friend picking it up. I explained my concern while on the phone with Springfield and they had the delivery canceled, i.e., returned to them and resent it when I was certain I would be there for the delivery. Kudos to Springfield that they not only reacted, but did not charge me for return shipping it twice.

10 Likes

Not directly applicable to this discussion, but interesting:

7 Likes

Catalogs. We need to bring back catalogs.

8 Likes

I am not a Lawyer [and I didn’t sleep at motel 6]

but a warning flag went up.

will this open up '‘no knock’ searches without a warrant ???

old senile minds want to know [sez my neibor who is asking]:zany_face:

6 Likes

Porch pirates will be on rise too!

4 Likes

I assume they would all require an adult signature in person at the time of delivery, not just leaving your new baby on the porch.

4 Likes

7 Likes

Here in the Big Blue, we have out CCP and still have to wait ten days before we can pick it up. Even though we have been cleared to carry concealed and we still have to wait and get a background check. So, ordering a gun from Midway USA and having it delivered to my door would be nice. I would be able to bypass the 150.00 to a FFL to get it even after paying for the gun.

6 Likes

In Nevada you get screwed, they have a law that states if the Seller does not have a physical presence in the State then you will be taxed on the purchase when you pick up at the FFL even though you have already paid the NV State tax to the seller at time of purchase.
When I purchased a complete AR pistol lower I had to pay tax twice, first and last time I will purchase an FFL item online.

I have contacted 2 governors and every person at the State Capitol, nothing but crickets

5 Likes

Wait,… so Nevada is taxing you twice?

Or Nevada is taxing you, then forcing you to pay the origin state tax as well?

4 Likes

Yup,
The Seller collects the NV State tax then the NV FFL collects it again.

4 Likes

How the hell is that even legal?

4 Likes

4 Likes

I’m not well versed in legalese,…

But it seems to read that the seller looking for the redelivery to the end consumer only has to document the sale, not the taxes,… and the local FFL completing the redelivery is responsible for collecting the taxes……

:man_shrugging::man_shrugging:

1 Like

It’s a Transfer of sale to the receiving FFL.
Any out-of-state sales tax is collected at the time of sale by the Seller.
The in-state FFL is to collect the same tax when the item is transferred from the in-state FFL to the Buyer.

A complete scam.

4 Likes