For the "Heavy Thinkers"

Researchers Say Humans Are In the Midst of an Evolutionary Shift Like Never Before

Story by Tibi Puiu

Human evolution has often been depicted as a process of adaptation, where natural selection and genetic changes drive species toward better-suited traits for survival in their environments. But this long-held view may be missing a major force in human evolution: culture.

A new theory is shaking up that conventional wisdom, suggesting that our evolution is not merely defined by our genes. Instead, it is increasingly shaped by the very culture we create, share, and adapt. Researchers at the University of Maine, Timothy Waring and Zachary Wood, argue that humanity is undergoing an unprecedented evolutionary shift — one driven not by genetics but by culture. This shift, they claim, could mark the beginning of an entirely new chapter in human history.

Cultural Change Over Genetic Change

In their new paper published in BioScience, Waring and Wood introduce a compelling hypothesis: human beings may no longer be primarily evolving through genetic means, but rather through cultural inheritance. Their research suggests that cultural systems — such as farming techniques, legal systems, and medical practices — are evolving far faster than biological traits could ever hope to. In fact, they argue, cultural evolution is outpacing genetic evolution in many ways, preempting what would have once been resolved through genetic changes.

“Culture is driving evolution at a pace genes simply can’t match,” says Wood, underscoring the argument that technological and cultural advancements can adapt to environmental challenges in a fraction of the time it would take genetic mutations to do the same. Take medical interventions like eyeglasses or cesarean sections, for example. These are cultural solutions that help resolve issues that genetics might have left unresolved, allowing humans to adapt and survive in ways that biology alone could never have anticipated.

A coupled evolutionary transition in inheritance and individuality caused by the role of culture in long-term human evolution is characterized by a positive feedback between the power of culturally organized groups and the adaptive capacity of culture relative to genetic evolution. Credit: Waring and Wood.© ZME Science

The shift from genetic to cultural evolution may not be as sudden or dramatic as flipping a switch. It’s a gradual process that has been ongoing for thousands of years. From the rise of agriculture to the development of modern institutions, culture has been a major driving force in human progress.

The Social Implications: A New Kind of Individuality

While the concept of human cultural evolution isn’t entirely new, the idea that we are witnessing an “evolutionary transition” that changes the very nature of what it means to be human is. In their research, Waring and Wood suggest that this shift in the mode of evolution may also mark a significant change in human individuality. Much like how early organisms evolved from single-celled life to complex multicellular organisms, humans may be transitioning from an individualistic species to one defined by group-level cooperation — similar to eusocial species like ants and bees.

This cultural transition, they argue, is essentially creating a new kind of “superorganism,” where the cultural systems humans have built (healthcare, education, and even political systems) are so deeply embedded in society that they function as the main adaptive force driving human survival. For example, societal structures like universal healthcare or technological innovations are not only shaping our environment, but they are also shaping our biology by reducing genetic selection pressures.

“We are becoming more dependent on the society we create than on the genetic traits we inherit,” explains Waring.

This observation invites an unsettling yet profound question: What does it mean for individual autonomy when the very systems that ensure survival and success are created and maintained by groups, rather than individuals?

The Future of Human Evolution: A Cultural Superorganism?

The implications of this cultural shift are far-reaching. If human survival and well-being increasingly depend on the cultural systems around us, what happens to individual genetic evolution? Will we see a future where humanity evolves not as a collection of genetically distinct individuals, but as a cooperative, culturally shaped superorganism?

The idea is that just as ants or bees operate as superorganisms, humans may one day operate similarly, with survival and reproduction dependent on the health of the cultural systems that define our societies. Waring and Wood are careful to note that this shift is still in its early stages, and much more research is needed to determine just how far this transition could go.

“We may be entering a future where cultural evolution is so advanced that it starts to control not just the environment we live in, but the very way we reproduce and evolve,” says Waring.

In fact, some of the most modern technologies already hint at this possibility. Genetic engineering and assisted reproductive technologies, which currently require sophisticated cultural infrastructures to function, are examples of how culture is already beginning to influence genetic outcomes. In the long term, this could lead to a scenario where our descendants evolve less through biological mutation and more through cultural innovations (i.e. technology).

No One Knows What Comes Next

The shift from genetic to cultural evolution presents many opportunities for further research, and Waring and Wood have outlined a clear path for measuring this transition. They plan to develop mathematical models and initiate long-term data collection to track the pace of this cultural shift and better understand its effects on human societies. However, they caution that such a transition is neither inherently progressive nor morally superior.

“We are not suggesting that wealthier societies with better technology are ‘better’ than others,” says Wood. “Culture evolves in both positive and negative directions, and it is important not to assume that this transition will always result in a more just or more equitable society.”

Indeed, the role of cultural evolution raises difficult ethical questions, especially when considering the global disparities in healthcare, education, and technology.

The challenge for humanity, then, is to ensure that as culture increasingly takes the reins of our evolution, we do so in a way that fosters cooperation, equity, and sustainability.

“Our future, as a species, may hinge less on the genes we inherit and more on the cultural systems we create and adapt to,” says Waring.

As we look to the future, the question may no longer be about what new genetic adaptations humanity will develop, but about what cultural innovations will continue to shape our survival, success, and perhaps, even our evolution.

This story originally appeared on ZME Science. Want to get smarter every day? Subscribe to our newsletter and stay ahead with the latest science news.

4 Likes

I think the vid is “part and parcel” of the article above. :thinking:

6 Likes

Looks interesting. I’ll take some time and review the article.

Thanks!

2 Likes
7 Likes

I recall in HS (dating myself, that was in the late 70s) that we were told that Fascism was rightwing as opposed to communism and socialism, but when it was explained what it was, I disagreed with my teacher. Of course that got me nowhere. :smiling_face_with_sunglasses:

6 Likes

The left always blames others for what they are doing. :roll_eyes:

10 Likes

Can you blame them?

1 Like

Of course.

2 Likes

Maybe that is why they blame us. Who knew?

1 Like

They blame us for doing what they do?

1 Like

Can you blame them?

1 Like

Left…:+1:

4 Likes

Yes…but “No.”

With all due respect to the authors; this sounds (without reading the paper and inspecting the footnotes) more like a graduate dissertation.

Many “cultural adaptations” are driven from “successful” human evolution. Prior to today’s free-market medical innovations, “Disgust/revulsion” was culturally used to combat behaviors that would medically threaten the tribal society. Basically, we evolved to the point where we adapted behaviors that would more likely continue human evolution/survival.

Sorry, perhaps too much bourbon tonight…:man_shrugging:

4 Likes

I know a few left wingers that could use that history lesson.

They’d deny it out of hand though, the Nazis of WWII were “nationalists” so thereby the MAGA movement being nationalist in genesis MUST be fascist! :roll_eyes::man_shrugging:

5 Likes

In WWII, I prefer to say that the Communists had already gone Global in an effort to create totalitarianism.

The nationalist Nazis were just in the process of doing so…

Totalitarians = Leftists.

3 Likes

How can we believe anything a “University researcher” has to say?
There’s a “woman” on the bench of the United States Supreme Court that doesn’t know what a woman is.
The first thing they got wrong, and I’m not a heavy thinker, it’s not
“evolutionary transition” it’s “de-evolutionary trannysition”.
Wasn’t meant to exactly be funny! We’re devolving!

“We are becoming more dependent on the society we create than on the genetic traits we inherit,”

Sounds like something a socialist would say! They want us to be dependent on the society they are creating.
Society was humming along just fine until Al Gore invented the internet. That was meant to be funny! Until a traitor took up space in the White House, then left it to a vegetable to totally phuck up!

6 Likes

:thinking:

5 Likes

Rise of the Denisovans!!!

Wait,… ohh nevermind.

5 Likes

Scott Atlas: We Must Empower Gen Z To Save America

Scott Atlas: We Must Empower Gen Z To Save America

Opinion by Tim Hains

Dr. Scott Atlas, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and co-founder of the Global Liberty Institute, spoke with Tom Bevan on Friday’s edition of the RCP podcast about his new article on the struggles of young people today: " Understanding and Saving Gen Z To Save America"

“We have a generation of people, Gen Z, who are very frantic about their perceived harm from hearing words. This is a new concept that’s sort of shocking to people like me,” Atlas said. “It’s not just that they’re fragile; they’re also very susceptible to things, and I feel social contagions are common in their world.”

“The question is: Why are they like that?”

“It’s a confluence of events. This stuff has been going on gradually for decades, frankly, but this sort of explosion is finally hitting us in this generation,” he said. “We see a severe problem with psychological harms, mental illnesses exploding, and this problem is very urgent.”

“This is not a fluke: the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the attempted shooting of Donald Trump, the shooting of the UnitedHealthcare CEO, schools being shot up by Gen Z people. We have to look at this and examine. My generation-we are partly responsible.”

“The answer, in part, is evidenced by the response of Gen Z to Charlie Kirk’s assassination: 50,000+ requests for new TPUSA chapters. They are thirsty for dialogue, thirsty for verbal exchange,” Atlas said. “We need to step up. People in my generation need to mentor young people in Gen Z-courageous young leaders. They will help in business, the arts, government, law. They will take the lead, like Charlie Kirk showed-showing courage, showing we need to have these discussions. We cannot have a free, diverse society without free debate.”

“There is no single answer, and there are many groups doing these sorts of activities, but we need to have the empowerment of the leaders in Gen Z itself. We need to identify them and mentor them, because they are the hope,” he suggested.

5 Likes