I remembered the overwhelming amount of information I consumed when I was looking for my first firearm. And that was after I had already shot a few and narrowed my search down to just Sig Sauer firearms.
My first was a Ruger GP100 6 inch. I wasn’t thinking about concealed carry then. Home defense and hunting. Cost was a factor for ammo, but, .38 isn’t that expensive. I still have that gun, and always will.
I researched the whole thing to death. Read articles and reviews and talked to people at my local range. I ended up with a 92fs and a Mark III target pistol. I loved the Mark 3 right away. It was like cheating always being able to get a small grouping at nearly any distance. 92 took some getting used to but I love it now and own a few of them. The third one was a px 4 subcompact which was great for training and learning. I eventually sold it as it was a pita to shoot!
Your suggestions are actually covered by Jason’s article as well:
How are you going to know if the gun is going to go bang every time you pull the trigger? Read reviews with a grain of salt and talk to people you know who have the guns you like.
And see if you can talk those people into taking you to the range so you can try their guns without the extra cost of the rental. I would suggest at least offering to pay for ammo and even cleaning their gun afterward with them to see how difficult it is to clean the firearm. And they will be more likely to take you to the range more often if you’re being so helpful!
I read it. The average friend or family member is not a qualified expert or authority on the subject, they likely bought whatever they are carrying based on what they picked up on some internet chat site populated by people with no real experience or expertise of their own.
The value of an opinion is the weight, experience, and expertise behind it.
The average gun owner won’t ever run enough rounds through one to even know how reliable it is, probably doesn’t know how to tell if a gun actually fits your hand, or even have an understanding of proper grip and recoil control.
Call me crazy but I think seeking the aid of respected authorities and professionals is likely to provide much better results than just searching the internet and getting advice from random strangers or family members with no real training, experience and who likely have never handled more than a couple of different handguns if that.
For me, it was a Smith and Wesson Model 3000 12ga shotgun with a folding metal stock. Then I discovered I couldn’t conceal it, but that was in California so…
After that, I met another gun dealer who had lots of pretties. The one that seemed reasonable and ‘enough’ without being too much to pocket carry (at home) was a Walther PPK/S in 380 auto. This little monster taught me a lot about grip, limp wrist, and railroad tracks on the web of my hand. It was also quite feisty with a snappy mouth. One could say accurate… enough… and willing to share copious amounts of gunshot residue over a session at the range.
The point is; I was clueless and as far as pistols went, playing with the money I’d have better used for rentals. Learning what made one gun different from another. It wasn’t until I’d WORKED for the store for 4 months that someone presented me with a gun that really did do most of the things I wanted, and, because it was California I didn’t have to worry about concealed carry anyway. I could carry it anywhere I wanted openly on my gun belt! (So long as it was holstered, wasn’t loaded, and I didn’t have a magazine loaded in my possession.) That gun was an S&W 4506. Sadly, I later traded that first-year production, LEO purchased, sold to me - because I was working in THEIR gun shop - needing a serious defensive arm just in case I was to help protect the house. ( I’m a big guy and that’ gun is still a handgrip full.)
My first was right after I turned 21 a looooong time ago. I got a Colt Officer’s Model .380. It was pretty but rarely carried. Concealed carry was not a thing back then.
I had one of those too. Lotta handle. Gritty and sloppy trigger (on mine anyway). Not many rounds in mag. Also sold it. Got a GP100. Didn’t consider CCW needs until many years later.
I recently bought the Taurus G3, tried out the G2C and it worked for me but I wanted something that I could get a better grip with. So far I enjoy my G3, it worked for my grip and my wallet. Still training to get the fundamentals down. I did a lot of research on the gun before I made the purchase.
Congrats on your G3 !
It’s great handgun but as you know, you get what you pay for.
You can try to navigate this Community and find some suggestions… but everybody will tell you that grip is a personal thing. We all have own experiences and these cannot be trusted because handgun perfectly fitted to somebody’s hand can be horrible for yours.
The best is to rent and try, or visit store or any gun shows, manufacturer’s demos - wherever you can keep the firearm in your hands.
My personal advice: watch YouTube videos and handguns reviews. Make list of firearms you like. Then focus on this list and watch videos again (even more). If you stay with max 3 firearms, find the range or store who get these. This way you will find the perfect tool.
Your dad or your grand dad or your uncle or maybe your mom gave you your first gun.
That first gun taught you what features you liked or disliked.
OR you enlisted and the government told you what firearms you liked and you learned to like them.
When you earned your own hard earned money to spend on your own firearm, you spent it accordingly. Any “tips” were either built in, so to speak, or they came from your shooting pals who blazed that trail before you.
Reliability doesn’t seem to be common to design any longer, well maybe to Glocks if the hype is to be believed, but a pal just bought a brand spanking new S&W revolver and it jams.
This isn’t something S&W revolvers do.
There’s also lots of 1911 criticism re a need to be broken in for reliability, as well.
Pardon me, but the 1911s I go with wrote the gospel on reliability (much like S&W revolvers!)
No 1911 issued USGIs were broken in (fired for function checks, yes, broken in no. If a specimen didn’t work it was rejected and returned)
Is it a decline workmanship that is causing all this reliability grief? Anyway, reputations for reliability have been damaged.
I’d ignore what I read about reliability these days----we seem to need a new metric.
Accuracy is another issue. Put a gun in a Ransom Rest and it will prove it’s accuracy with one hole groups at 25 yards if the wind is still, but is it accurate in a new shooter’s hands?
Aye, that’s the rub.
I’m not a great shot, but in my 30’s I had a vision problem and before corrective surgery I could take any expensive high end target pistol and miss the broad side of a barn with it.
For most new shooters with no trigger finesse and only hearsay understand of how iron sights work, repeatable, satisfying accuracy is going to take some time and work. This is complicated by some models that come with adjustable sights which are screwed down for protection during shipment—how does a new shooter even begin to assess accuracy when a gun isn’t even sighted in (the good ol’ Webely Tempest air pistol comes to mind!)