I like this. Reminder how complex a simple situation really can be.
Valid point @Fred_G good input I didn’t initially consider.
I like this. Reminder how complex a simple situation really can be.
Valid point @Fred_G good input I didn’t initially consider.
Yeah shoot the knife out of their hand or fire a warning shot. Maybe just surrender they’ll just rob you, it’ll be okay. Hey how about this one wait for the police. File these under " things you should never do" lol
True, but you cannot expect every person out there to train to his level.
You forgot “pay them to not commit the crime in the first place.”
You right @RocketPak. Can’t expect every person trains
Center mass is also the slowest moving target.
you mean "the Leg? ", the body part that has the femoral artery and would bleed out before aid could be rendered?
Not at all. I meant the body part recommended as a less lethal option by the current resident of the White House.
Only 30%of shots fired in self defense hit their target.
1.) do the math.
2.) did the robber point the gun at you or fire the gun ?
3.) angle of entry of BULLETS into the assailants body will be a issue IE: back or side.
This issue excludes family members put in a unsafe condion : then that is a no holds barred situation.
PS: even if your not convicted of a crime you can be sued civilly for a wrongful death or for injury that you caused. The injury Can be in a one lump sum payment or medical payments for the rest of the injured persons life.
How’s that shoulder shot sound now.
If it is my intent to remove the threat, I am on solid legal ground to use lethal force.
Trying to make the lethal force less than lethal is complicating a situation unnecessarily.
Where does that come from?
In today’s world of wokeness and social (in)justice (McCloskeys), I ain’t wanting to try my luck in court.
@Matthew156 I live in Louisiana, Civil Law, don’t matter to us anything about (McCloskeys)
That’s why USCCA is so beautiful.
@Matthew156 That’s only my opinion.
Let me know how you make out with putting yours into action.
Hope I don’t hear from you. STAY SAFE.
@G.Washington >> yep << I hope USCCA IS PALS WITH THE JUDGE <<<
Rouge prosecutors are every where
@Matthew156 >> no fooling around. If I was going to shoot to disable it would be a GROIN SHOT. even not hitting Vitals can smash pelvic bones or hips, not to mention severing the spinal Column.
If less-than-lethal-force is what you’re after, well, that’s what tazers and pepper spray are for. It’s your call. It’s also your funeral.
@Matthew156 >> you people make me ( NUTS ) I think I’m onto something with groin shots because it would be a trifecta 1.) to stop the attacker.
2.) if the criminal was (Was) a sex offender they wouldn’t have to make his address public anymore because it would be a FAILURE TO APPEAR (no balls)
3.) when the criminal goes to prison we would save money on a sex change