Organization reqt for COVID vaccine

[Dave17]

@Aaron25

The point I was trying to make without being ‘100% false’ was that if a person or persons by choice, engages in high risk behavior, there should be consequences for it.

As a medical and insurance professional, your false information, apparently intentional, does not help people make informed decisions. Being ignorant also puts oneself at higher risk, as does being fat, old, and a firearm owner. Also being in the medical profession puts one at a higher risk, too, even those wearing N-95 masks, and therefore, should not be allowed to have insurance, either, as you, by choice, put yourself, and those you are in contact with, at higher risk.

This is from a study of those in the medical field, from those with no contact to patients, to those with high contact (doctors, nurses, etc.). Seropositivity in those wearing any type of mask was 10.9%; 95% CI: 10.1%–11.6%; of those who used N95 or Powered Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR) masks being 10.3% (95% CI: 9.5%–11.1%) seropositive compared to other mask types (13.1%; 95% CI: 11.4%–14.9%; P = .0033).

Let’s hear your flippant comment about this study, as in your PM to me about the study that referenced a study on spike proteins and hamsters. Clearly you did not read the studies I provided links to, before you gave your reply.

One would assume that someone in the medical profession would understand the usefulness of animal studies and not subjecting humans to studies that could cause harm to them. Do you believe spike proteins act differently on human cells than on those of hamsters? Please post your source(s) for your claim to prove otherwise.

@Aaron25

I’d like the community to be a place that feels more like a group of friends, not a verbal fight.
I’m out.

Friends do not intentionally post false information. It was not a verbal fight for me, but a means to provide factual information to counter your falsehoods. I have little tolerance for the willfully ignorant and for those that intentionally spread false information.

@Aaron25

MOST INSURANCE COMPANIES (like the ones we all use) don’t cover soldiering, skydiving, etc.–because their increased risk would transfer cost to the insured population.

And here again, you are posting false information that my first response to you cleared-up. I do not consider one that tries to intentionally deceive others as a friend. You had ample time and ability to provide factual information, and to provide links to sources that would substantiate your claims. Instead, you chose to post these responses; ones that showed arrogance, condescension, rudeness, ignorance, and possible professional misconduct - giving false information to mislead others on a topic you are licensed for, if not just being unethical - there are consequences for that, but I am sure you will not report yourself to board review.