Appreciate it.
My interests include on a personal level – mainly to learn more in-depthly per se, for the discipline it may provide me, for the value of being credentialed in such knowledge and skills, for better knowing what to do in such an emergency (my worst fear).
And from a greater community perspective – to further advance our community. With the oppositions we face, I wondered if such credentialing could add strength to who we are, not as a requirement, but for those of us who already plan to take extra classes, on a “volunteer by choice” basis.
When I started looking at the various “for pay” smaller classes offered at the ranges, by the USCCA, and thinking of taking them, I thought about what value they provide – and wondered if there were any which would add to our own credentials other than just the learning itself.
I found some “in-person” classes on marksmanship, and safe handling of a firearm, but so far my search has found less on what to do in an emergency and less about the legalities.
Although I’m more interested in “non” NRA affiliated training (though I’m member), and not courses from laws schools, but more so – affordable and specific practical classes and training for those in the conceal carry community. Thus, more neutral politically as well.
I respect fear of the law, fear is good, it keeps us smart and safe. Much respect there from me, tons. However, a part me is also transparent to anti-gunners, or even prosecutors, and am willing to openly face them head on, as I should have nothing to hide.
Create more liabilities? What can create more of a liability than possessing a firearm? Then having fired it, “Pandora’s box has then been opened”.
Of course, anti-gunners and prosecutors will use that against us, but they already do for us having a FOID, and a CCL Permit.
It’s a personal decision, and I’m not looking to convert anyone. In weighing the idea of “Being trained to a certified standard which could create more liabilities if my actions are judged to have not met that standard”, Vs. “Not being trained”, it’s an easy decision for me; I choose to be trained. For me, it’s weighing the pro’s and con’s, it’s an easy decision, but not for all.
On the same token, can my attorney turn that around and use it in my favor?
Making such credentialing mandatory for conceal carry – to me, would be too extreme. My interest is on advancing my education in this field. For me to hinder education because I’m afraid “they” will make it mandatory, is not who I am. If I allow that, allow them to prevent me from such learning, I’d feel personal shame.
Some of us are already taking such courses, just not certified per se. Anti-gunners and prosecutors already know this. I just refuse to live in fear of them.
I’ve not yet found a local certification program, though I noticed the USCCA has a program with “Qualifying” tier designations.
Sorry I came off too strong. You all are some of my favorites and I often look forward to your posts, from whom I also learn a lot. One of my favorite sayings is “If you want to be a better person, never surround yourself with people who only agree with you”. 
