Not guilty but guilty?

“A jury found a West Point man not guilty of murder on Friday after his attorney argued he was defending both himself and his vehicle during a road rage incident.”

“In a hearing on Tuesday following the trial, 2nd District Judge Jennifer Valencia found him guilty of two counts of possession of a firearm as a restricted person, a third-degree felony. Bautista said he had asked for those charges to be determined by the judge outside of the trial to not add confusion to the jury about his right to defend himself even if he cannot legally possess a gun.”

The moral of the story, defend yourself when you are stone cold sober. If you are stoned or drunk let the bastard kill you?

6 Likes

“In hindsight, now that he knows what has happened, he realizes he probably should have just stopped once he got the license plate, but he was following …what he thought was directions.”

Hindsight is 20/20.

4 Likes

The moral of the story is that you can legally defend yourself using lethal tool even you are not permitted to own this tool… and that is a good thing.

5 Likes