Marlin 1894 trapper 357 mag 16” 70452

$1,089

6 Likes

Vs $1.299 at Turners :face_holding_back_tears::face_holding_back_tears::face_holding_back_tears:

6 Likes

You’re welcome :grinning_face:

4 Likes

insidiously insidious??? :grinning_face:

3 Likes

Investively Assistive :grinning_face:

5 Likes

:musical_notes: Always look on the bright side of life. :musical_notes:

2 Likes

Not the Trapper but Classic Model 70410 $999 cash price

4 Likes

I DO NOT know how Anti-Gun-Grabbers exist thinking this is EVIL when in reality (my reality anyway) it’s nothing short of SEXY Squared ! (I’m totally serious)

4 Likes

See that particular one isn’t evil in their eyes.

They might even laugh and say the 1800’s called and they want their rifle back.

Now, don’t be displaying a black AR-style. It doesn’t matter if it’s in .22LR.

3 Likes

I loved the Marlin 444P back in the day. Think I may need to get a new 1895 Trapper, 16”, in .45-70. Loaded with 250g it should behave extremely similarly to the 444P.

2 Likes

New Marlins are nice but I’ll keep my real marlin 1894 in 357.

They aren’t remlins now, are they rulins? Ruglins?

4 Likes