That sucks
Hmm, the Senate can re-add it, due to the “Byrd Rule.”
What are the odds that the Republican majority Senate will do so?
Close to…zero?
I don’t know if this is good or bad. I mean on one hand we made sure they knew that we aren’t happy with them only getting rid of the 200$ tax so we might have another chance but on the other we might not get another chance and have lost or only opportunity to get rid of the 200$ tax in a long time.
I don’t see the good side. Matthew 5:30. states: "And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be cast into hell.
I see you don’t understand, let me try to explain it.
The original bill had suppressors completely off the NFA, liberals made a “compromise” where the bill only removed the 200$ tax. It still takes money to fill out the paperwork and importantly they still have you on the registry. We weren’t happy about this “compromise” so we made our voices heard.
Let me explain. They didn’t hear our voices. It is an infringe on our constitutional rights and it will continue to infringe on our constitutional rights until the bill is passed.
The bill may have taken away a tax but that doesn’t change the underlying issue. The point of making sure it didnt pass was telling them that we wont be placated by smaller treats like this and are smart enough to see the big picture. We need it off the NFA and nothing else.
What the bill may or might have done, it didn’t. I think what you were saying is we tried and failed but at least we tried.
So what do you see as the bigger picture?
“of” or “off”? Suppressors currently are of the NFA. i personally would like to see suppressors, SBRs, and machine guns OFF the NFA.
he he, thanks
I thought that’s what you meant 