Plus Plus!
If I use my pocketknife to defend myself, it isnât an assault weapon, but if I use it to attack someone, it is an âassault weaponâ, and I will be charged with assault with a deadly weapon, as it is a knife, regardless of size. They need to eat as many turds as it takes for them to die or grow some.
EXACTLY! An error occurred: Body seems unclear, is it a complete sentence?
OH STFU!
(not you Dave ole Buddy!)
Yeah, the âAR-15 is technically not a military weaponâ is an intellectually lazy argument for supporting the 2nd amendment. The proper argument, as somebody mentioned above, is that it doesnât matter. The 2nd amendment was designed so that a governed body could fight on an even playing field with an oppressive government. In order to do that, you should have access to the same weaponry they would use against you. That weaponry has changed over the years, but the principle behind the amendment stands.
Good points, and Iâll go one further. Being that our founders saw fit to write into the second amendment that we need a well regulated militia to protect the security of our free state, itâs my interpretation that they in fact wanted us, the militia, to exactly have military weapons. What good is a militia defending the security of the state if they donât have sufficient weapons?
If we must classify weapons like this then you need to look at bullet energy and how rapidly and acurately a skilled person can shoot. Really, nothing else matters - how much damage can you do to how many people in a given time frame. What the gun looks like is irrelevant.
Iâm sure a lever action can do okay, but, itâs all relativeâŠcompared to a modern semi auto mag fed and users of equal skill, the semi auto removable mag fed is winning every time. Thatâs why cowboy lever actions arenât really used by military, police, etc, any more
Muzzle loaders were a military weapon here in the US tooâŠbut, wellâŠjust like lever actions replaced them because they were better, mag fed semi autos yada yada
If we are going to use a âhow rapidly and accuratelyâ as the standard.
I inferred that because the topic of the thread is AR15 style rifles
Once AR15s will have been declared illegal for conflated reasons, declaring handguns illegal because 90%+ of gun crime involves handguns will be a piece of cake.
The post above you was talking about classifying firearms like AR15âs
Nibble Nibble Nibble CHOMP, Donât need to win today, donât need to win tomorrow but in time, they might win.
Thatâs exactly it.
Death by a thousand papercuts
Or, one slide of the cake/pie at a time.
Inch by inch, they take the whole beach. And then the country
Iâm there with you on that. Itâs their narrative. And no mention of the criminal on the trigger ![]()
Wont get my piece of pie lol ![]()