Please watch this 2.5 hours of video between a Podcaster and a Warrior.
This explains what is REALLY going on ‘Out There!’
It’s basically self explanatory (though I would love to give you my usual long winded take on all this)
It’s Christmas, so I won’t. That’s my gift to all my Brothers and Sisters here.
Stay Safe
Check 6 (often)
but for God’s sake don’t LAY DOWN to EVIL!
Where We Go 1 We Go All !
When is Trump going to recognize and follow the Constitution? When that happens I will follow him, till then, not so much. Next question.
Where and when did he violate the Constitution I don’t love the Guy but when someone makes comments like that I want poof. Not just words
If you are talking about ‘Prez DJT’ there are NO VIOLATIONS, NO ILLEGAL ORDERS . Period. He wouldn’t do that.
There are also NO FACTS for the ‘Seditious Six’ to back up their claims.
BUT! there i this FACT!
Mark Kelly has made a “No Corporate PAC” pledge central to his campaign efforts. Of course, Kelly has lied to Arizonans because he has bent the rules of his pledge to accept more than $825,500 in corporate PAC, executive, and lobbyist money in 2021.(Courtesy of the NRSC)
Oh, Hey isn’t that….?
They don’t even TRY to hide it!
No my comments were for Papa Zed, Don102 as always he makes comments with no poof of sh#t
I will start with the 14th Amendment which he believes should not exist.
$825k sounds like he has broke friends, how much did Elon give Trump again?
Yeah, I understand Bruh. I still can’t understand why anyone gives them credence.
If folk’s aren’t part of the SOLUTION, They are The PROBLEM.
“Not following the Constitution” means “violating the Constitution”.
Where’s your proof he is violating the Constitution?
By the way, the 14th Amendment was designed to address issues related to citizenship and the rights of formerly enslaved people following the Civil War.
It is not a coincidence that the six congressional Democrats released a video urging active military members to “refuse illegal orders” just days before billboards saying the same thing went up outside of U.S. Southern Command in Florida and Fort Bragg in North Carolina. Nor is it a coincidence that just days after that, media outlets aligned with the Democratic Party falsely reported that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered Navy SEAL Team 6 to launch a second lethal strike on two “survivors” from a drug boat not totally demolished by an initial missile strike.
These events are not random. They are all part of a coordinated campaign by the Democratic Party and its media allies to undermine President Donald Trump, sow dissent, and divide the country. These are the same tactics we saw them deploy for the Russia collusion hoax, for the attempted destruction of Justice Brett Kavanaugh hoax, and for the Ukraine impeachment hoax.
The Washington Post(Pravda on the Potomac) which reported the unsubstantiated and evidently false allegations against Kavanaugh and was rewarded for its Russian collusion hoax reporting with prizes, accused Hegseth of ordering the military “to kill everybody” on the drug boat, which would have violated long-standing policy. Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley directly contradicted that reporting this week, telling lawmakers no such order was given.Instead, Bradley and Hegseth are reported to have watched the first strike together, after which Hegseth left to perform other duties. It was not until an hour later that two drug runners were identified on the remains of the boat, and because of the presence of other enemy vessels in the area, and the possibility that the drug runners could communicate with them via radio, Bradley ordered the second strike.
Think on this folk’s, How deep into TDS and being a bagman for the Cabal do you have to be to SUPPORT Transnational DRUG TRAFFICKING that kills 70,000+ Americans a year?… I’ll give you a minute.
What part of the Constitution didnt he violate would be a shorter discussion. I suggest you actually read the Constitution and the amendments before asking dumb questions. “Source?” And “proof?” wont matter if you dont understand the basics. Educate yourself.
Or as they say in the biz, “deflecting”.
Again comments no proof
You don’t know me so I willover look a dumbass reply because if you knew me you would know that I have a degree in Constitutional law. I deal with facts and proof. Good bye
Trump has not violated the 14th Amendment. Trump has started the ball rolling that will get SCOTUS to define what the 14th Amendment means. Nobody has had their citizenship revoked, yet. If SCOTUS says no, then nothing will change.
I wrote this for a forum that has since banned me:
5/14/2009, 1:01:29 AM · 22 of 24
The line in the sand... moves.
Every time we allow "just a little" freedom to be taken. Every time we allow a skoshi bit of common sense to escape our laws. Every time we don't defend a minority. Every time we submit to another little bit of infringement. Every time we allow our neighbor to be hauled off for breaking a law we agree with; but the law is inherently unjust. Our line in the sand... moves.
We all have drawn lines in the sand. We all (many? most?) back away and draw new lines. It is only when our backs are against the wall do we say, "No more!".
So, next time you read an article in the MSM about some "wacko" who violently opposed arrest because s/he wasn't wearing a seatbelt; think maybe that person's line in the sand got backed off once too often?
or something like that...
But when our backs HAVE been pushed against the wall because we moved our line in the sand once too often; reckon we'll fight like cornered junkyard dawgs? (Think "momma bear protecting her cubs!")
Ultimately the question isn't "Do you have a line in the sand?", the question should be "Where's your wall, and who's watching your back?".
Bottom line; Who’s got your back?
The other don
The chain of command; from the guy who pulled the trigger, all the way up to the prez DJT:
Maybe not. In the reply to Papa_Zed:
“The event on September 2, in which Pete Hegseth said he didn’t have time to stick around to see who survived it, is defied by the Washington Post (which claims seven—seven—sources, they must be military or intelligence) who said that Admiral Bradley asked Hegseth, “What do you want me to do?” And Hegseth verbally said, “Kill everybody.”“
You’re gonna hate me, but WTH?
The premise is wrong. Those people were in the act of committing crimes - drug trafficking.
In the United States, a person cannot be executed solely for drug trafficking. Federal law contains the Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) statute (21 U.S.C. 848), often called the “drug kingpin” law. This statute permits capital punishment only when the drug enterprise results in a killing or when the defendant intentionally kills a law enforcement officer. The death penalty is therefore tied to the resulting homicide, not the trafficking activity itself, and no US state authorizes capital punishment for drug trafficking alone.
International Jurisdictions Implementing the Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking
The use of capital punishment for drug trafficking is maintained by a small number of nations, primarily in Asia and the Middle East. Countries known to impose this penalty include Iran, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, China, and Indonesia. Globally, drug offenses account for a significant portion of all known executions, highlighting the severity with which these states treat the crime.
Many of these jurisdictions employ mandatory death sentences, meaning a judge has no discretion to impose a lesser penalty once the statutory criteria are met. Iran remains the world’s most frequent executioner for drug offenses, and execution methods vary by country, potentially including hanging, firing squad, or beheading.
Death Penalty for Drug Dealers: US and International Laws - LegalClarity