Soooo,…. like most of Europe?
I mean, our government is pretty good at stealing our money and getting nothing done with it,…. But watching BBC on a regular, I’d rather live here thanks.
Edit was @JimL
Soooo,…. like most of Europe?
I mean, our government is pretty good at stealing our money and getting nothing done with it,…. But watching BBC on a regular, I’d rather live here thanks.
Edit was @JimL
there’d be a better choice of politicians as well. This governing by emotion is getting old. (Watching a NY hissy fit today, rep totally ignoring the illegal immigration part and claiming to speak for all New Yorkers).
Without illegals, who’ll clean his toilet?
Better not make the test too hard or only the Dems can pass it.
Not if the “test” is showing an ID to verify their identity!
![]()
![]()
Showing your ignorance again. The SAVE Act has nothing to do with showing ID to vote. When a party tries to prevent people from voting it means they can win on their ideas.
What? That test too hard for you?
I’m sure you’re right. We’ve seen what they’ve done to “education.”
I’ll bite. If they just accepted all votes, how do they know which are from citizens…
… or being able to speak English, have a legitimate job, and be a citizen.
You mean the Democrat blue areas shouldn’t have all the power over the red areas?
Because it certainly seems that’s what they want.
WOW, that is what you gleaned from this? “Establishing independent redistricting commissions (IRCs) to remove map-drawing power from politicians.” "Adopting proportional representation systems, which make it nearly impossible to draw map lines that significantly disadvantage a political party."
Please, what word do you not understand?
I am not sure if you are just incapable of reading comprehension or if you just live in a fantasy land where you just dream things up because you fail to understand everything and create other like-minded people to converse with.
Question: Have you ever been talking to a person and then suddenly realized you were the only one in the room?
Something that might help you better understand me and where I come from: I am NOT a party person. I am not a sheep like most that believe you must stand behind a party even if you know they are wrong.
I am a constitutionalist. I support limited government, the rule of law, and the protection of individual liberties against arbitrary actions by public officials. The better, smarter version of an individual. Idiots party too much!
Land doesn’t vote, people do. Most of that red area is empty space with very few people.
So those people don’t count….
Got it.
Wow, that’s a lot of lemmings!
Maybe you would prefer a map of red versus blue counties.
At least the framers recognized the need for small states (AND/OR corresponding small populations within states) to have a vote system that allowed equal representation for those states. (A republic, as opposed to the democratic “majority rule”.) Brilliant, but the people who oppose the Constitution somehow don’t see it as being representative of a “United States”.
Gerrymandering however, is an abomination.
Yeah, land doesn’t vote. Sorry.
For the Senate I assume you mean? The original 13 colonies were not as varied in population as states are today (thanks to the 3/5 Compromise) so this was not really a problem that needed to be addressed. But today, we have very large states and very small states with extremely different senate representive power. California and Texas have almost no senate power by population, while Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska, the Dakotas have very high senate power by population. That needs to be fixed too.
Don’t know if the fomatting will come through. But here is a new 50 state plan with equal senate power to show how out of whack it is…
Split these states:
| Original State | 2026 Pop. (Est.) | Resulting States | Avg. Pop / State |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 39.3M | 6 (e.g., North, South, Central, Sierra, LA, SD) | 6.55M |
| Texas | 32.1M | 5 (e.g., North, South, East, West, Central) | 6.42M |
| Florida | 23.7M | 3 (North, Central, South) | 7.90M |
| New York | 20.0M | 3 (NYC, Metro-Suburbs, Upstate) | 6.66M |
| Pennsylvania | 13.1M | 2 (East, West) | 6.55M |
| Illinois | 12.7M | 2 (Chicago-land, Prairie) | 6.35M |
| Ohio | 11.9M | 2 (North, South) | 5.95M |
| Georgia | 11.4M | 2 (Metro Atlanta, Southern) | 5.70M |
| North Carolina | 11.3M | 2 (Coastal/Piedmont, Mountain) | 5.65M |
And combine these:
| New Regional State | Combined Current States | Combined Pop. |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic State | Maryland + Delaware | 7.4M |
| Appalachia | Kentucky + West Virginia | 6.4M |
| Gulf Coast | Louisiana + Mississippi | 7.6M |
| Ozark-Plains | Oklahoma + Arkansas | 7.2M |
| Cascadia-Interior | Oregon + Idaho | 6.4M |
| High Desert | Utah + Nevada | 6.9M |
| New England | CT + RI + NH + VT + ME | 8.2M |
| Mid-Plains | Iowa + Kansas + Nebraska | 8.2M |
| Frontier State | NM + ND + SD + MT + WY + AK + HI | 7.7M |