What if our founding fathers were pro gun control, and the second amendment read something like…
" The people shall have the right to a safe, gun free country, without the immediate threat and danger of a gun toting society, and furthermore, this right shall not be infringed"
…would you accept the “shall not be infringed” part, or would you fight for your right to bear arms, therefore challenging the second amendment.
Please do not let your initial response be an attack, as I am 100% pro 2A
This post is to raise consciousness and/or awareness to the full spectrum of the debate, and in the hopes of bringing people together when debating this topic, in that we can begin to understand one anothers’ views and/or concerns.
The simpler the answer, the better
This post is referring to civilian population, NOT MILITARY OF COURSE.