You’re not wrong.
I am curious though. Other than “orange man bad”, I’ve heard nothing about an actual plan, for anything. I’d like to know, what is your (democrats) plan?
You’re not wrong.
I am curious though. Other than “orange man bad”, I’ve heard nothing about an actual plan, for anything. I’d like to know, what is your (democrats) plan?
As you well know, team blue has no plan for anything. They proved that. Over and over. Never again in my lifetime, I hope.
Orange man bad!
Spend taxpayer money on foreign aid and wars
Orange man bad!
Grant citizenship to anyone who steps on US soil
Orange man bad!
Rebuild Epstein island and put Diddy in charge of it.
Orange man bad!
What an idiot!
We barely have leadership, much less a plan.
I’m not one to soap box about The End Of The Party kind of stuff, BUT Both parties NEED to understand, the power is in the middle, playing to the fringes is a recipe for failure.
Not wrong, but like the other side I have some issues I’m only willing to move so far on. I’m open to finding a middle ground, but I don’t know what that looks like.
*Gun control, or, rather, that there should be a lack of it, is one such issue I’m unwilling to move much on, even though that’s not a particularly common stance on the left at the moment.
Last article references China and illegal immigration, thus posting here.
Better to have tried and failed than not tried at all.
The idiom “follow the crowd” generally means to do what most other people are doing. While there are times when following the crowd can be a good strategy (e.g., finding a safe path in a crowd), it’s not always the best approach, especially when individual judgment and unique solutions are needed.
Here’s why it’s not always best to follow the crowd:
The “bandwagon effect” can lead people to make decisions based on popular opinion rather than sound reasoning, potentially leading to risky or unethical behavior.
Following the crowd can stifle creativity and innovation, as individuals are less likely to explore new ideas or pursue alternative paths.
Sometimes, following the crowd can conflict with one’s own values or beliefs, potentially leading to internal conflict or a sense of dishonesty.
A critical thinker doesn’t automatically accept the opinions or actions of the majority but instead examines them with reason and evidence.
In some situations, following the crowd can offer benefits, such as social connection or safety in numbers. However, it’s important to be aware of the potential drawbacks and to consider whether following the crowd is the best course of action in each specific situation.
In short, while “following the crowd” can sometimes be a helpful strategy, it’s crucial to think critically and consider the potential downsides before blindly adopting the behavior of others.
Like @Gregory258 says your not wrong, sometimes…
Except, in our political system “Majority Rules”. Group think ie The American People. Ignore that and you get the last Administration…
Hopefully not.
This is true, unfortunately.
At least we’re all equal…
A former analyst with the National Security Agency said that China is positioning equipment in “strategic places” that could be used to disrupt U.S. commerce after rogue communication devices were found inside Chinese solar power inverters.
Rogue communication devices that were not in official product documents were found inside Chinese solar power inverters when they were examined by U.S. experts for possible security issues, two sources told Reuters.
The two sources said that the rogue power inverters have undocumented communication channels which could be used to circumvent firewalls remotely, which could have major consequences. These power inverters connect the solar panel to electic grids.
Rocky Cole, former intelligence analyst at the National Security Agency and co-founder of iVerify, told Fox News Digital it’s “very conceivable” that China is using these rogue power inverters to gain access to American infrastructure.
“It very much fits into the model of China implanting hardware in American critical infrastructure for the purpose of planning cyberattacks against the United States in the event of, say, a conflict with Taiwan or something along those lines,” Cole said.
Chinese companies are mandated by law to assist China’s intelligence agencies when needed.
Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C. gave Fox News Digital the following statement:
“The goal of China’s pursuit of development is to enable its people to live a better life. We oppose the presumption of guilt under unclear facts, the generalization of the concept of national security, and the distortion and smear of China’s achievements in the field of energy infrastructure,” Pengyu said.
According to one of the sources, the undocumented communication devices, which include cellular radios, were found in batteries from multiple suppliers from China over the past nine months.
Cole said this is just another example of China preparing for a possible conflict involving the U.S.
“There are communications devices in these really strategic places that you can imagine could theoretically be used to disrupt U.S. commerce in the event of some sort of conflict,” Cole said. “It’s difficult not to view Chinese-made hardware in the realm of critical infrastructure as a national security threat in my mind.”
“Any time that you have any time that there’s a supply chain outside the U.S. or U.S.-allied countries, that presents opportunities for what’s called in intelligence parlance, supply chain operation, which means intelligence operatives work with the manufacturers to implant backdoors in the hardware,” he added.
“Without strict oversight of supply chains, it becomes very difficult to certify with any confidence that your hardware doesn’t contain these backdoors implanted in supply chain operations. I think it’s critically important that American officials are aware of the risks posed by Chinese-made hardware as it relates to critical infrastructure.”
BREAKING NEWS
Liberal Judge, Buddy Whackit, an Obama appointee, has preemptively ruled that any attempt to remove, alter or otherwise interfere with these undocumented communication devices would be a violation of their first amendment rights.
As this story breaks, democrats have already begun rioting, smashing and fire-bombing non-solar energy plants across the country while chanting “From the pasture to the sun”.
This is a developing story, updates will follow
Nothing!
They created the problem.
They left that
show for us to resolve.
They are still resisting our trying to fix their problem that they so generously gifted us.
just a thought… they opened the borders because we the people pretty much refused to allow what is happening in most ero nations… ???
Other than it’s people breaking the law to protect people that are breaking the law, which is offensive as he!!, I have ask, maybe all law enforcement aught to just pull out of LA, give them what they want. We can sit back and watch what happens when the criminals are asked to protect and defend the criminals… I suspect things would get really real really fast…