In an article shown in ConcealedCarry, written by Jacob Paulsen, the discussion of the Glock bans of the basis of the automatic “switch” goes in depth. In AMAC today they look at it as a way to sneak gun control around the corners. It is critical that we watch this kind of activity and meet it head on. Copy of AMAC article here…
“Our gun violence prevention laws need to keep up with what’s going on in the world as far as it relates to emerging technologies and the development of weapons
that enable criminals to easily circumvent these laws with the intention of inflicting mass harm.
Criminals, circumvent, laws. Politicians are ■■■■■■■ idiots!
Umm, I believe that the real point here is:
Criminals are the D Party’s constituents. Anything to make their constituent’s life easier, they will propose. Banning or “controlling” firearms from law-abiding citizens makes their constituent’s “job” easier. Ergo, propose the law.
I suppose that I should add that some “Gun Control” PAC is going to drop $1M into the “Legislator’s” coffer, as well…
Do you really believe this? I think the concept is good for a laugh.
I see them as just misguided sheep. Thinking the world would be safer if no one had guns. It is their lack of firsthand knowledge from the ToFo towers.
If it were only this simple. It is not a party; it is the people. Point me to the party that has no criminals in office right now.
If you point to the Libertarians, you would be right only because none of them hold positions in the U.S. Congress or Governorships currently.
![]()
I will find King Solomon’s gold first