Post Office carry
7 Likes
I’m going to listen in more detail later.
SAF member here… AI says,
“These court rulings were narrow and only applied to the specific plaintiffs (e.g., members of the Firearms Policy Coalition or Second Amendment Foundation) in those particular cases.”
5 Likes
6 Likes
https://saf.org/saf-win-post-office-carry-ban-injunction-covers-current-and-future-members/
BELLEVUE, Wash. — March 17, 2026 — In a case that has far-reaching implications, a District Court Judge in Texas held in favor of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners, confirming that all current and future members are covered by the injunction granted in the case which prevents the enforcement of the post office carry ban at most ordinary locations.
In September, the Northern District of Texas ruled in favor of SAF and declared the carry ban on post office property unconstitutional, enjoining its enforcement against the plaintiffs, including SAF and its members. In response to the ruling, the government filed a motion to limit the scope of the injunction to only the named individual plaintiffs and to members of SAF and its partner organizations who were members when the complaint was originally filed and who have been identified and verified.
4 Likes
So, should I now always bring my SAF membership card with me in case I need to go to the post office?
6 Likes
Define ordinary
5 Likes
Or, “most” for that matter.
I think I need to read the Judge’s ruling myself. But, at least it sounds promising. 
5 Likes
Those post offices that are not in a location where firearms are otherwise prohibited.
5 Likes
This is a start (Too bad I avoid the P.O. like the Plague!)
We need a BAN on ‘GUN FREE ZONES!’ now THAT is saying something!
7 Likes
Victim Zones
7 Likes
Don’t you mean “DEFENSELESS VICTIM ZONES!”?
4 Likes