EDC revolver

Something I always come back to when evaluating capacity is this combination of things:

*Average hit rate is about 20%
*Handguns are weak and ineffective as a general rule when it comes to stopping a violent, determined attacker ASAP…multiple good hits are often required to physiologically stop an attacker
*Violent criminals fairly commonly act in concert, meaning two or more attackers

Those things combined make me weary of revolvers, generally.

It also appears that the encounter pretty much always ends with the ammo that was in the gun at the start. Reloads or retrieving a different gun, for the private citizen self defender, seem to basically never happen.

So…have “enough” in the gun when it kicks off

Buuuut, that said, having “a gun” is likely adequate the majority of the time, as most defensive gun uses, as mentioned above, have literally 0 rounds fired. And quite a few have 5 or fewer.

But quite a few also don’t

5 Likes

I still see a revolver, even with limited capacity, has having several advantages over automatics for self-defense.
Different story for LEO or military uses, although I’m just old enough to have military training on revolvers.

From my understanding, the number of shots fired in a gun fight often depends on how many rounds of ammunition the shooters have in their guns. When police switched from revolvers to automatics, the number of shots fired doubled.

The question for me is, how many rounds do I realistically need?

There are times and anticipated circumstances where I think having more rounds might become an asset and I will carry an automatic. But for EDC, a revolver has proven to be more than adequate for me for several decades.

3 Likes

I think @John1507 raises a good point about shooting to the number of rounds you have available. We’ve all seen the videos of the police dumping whole magazines into a car or at a bad guy without even noticing if the threat had stopped or not. On the other hand, the idea of stopping a committed group of thugs with only 5 or 6 shots on board IS concerning. Usually, it seems from the defensive shooting stories I read, that when the first thug gets shot, the others run for their lives.

FWIW, here’s my thought on the whole revolver/pistol debate.

I’m glad we have such good options.

I carry a small revolver nearly every single day. I’ve done so for about 3 years now. Before that I never carried a gun for self defense, but have been a nearly lifelong shooter. When I chose my first SD EDC, I went revolver for two main reasons.

I’d had enough times over many years of rifle shooting where I got my sights just right, perfect breath control, and pressed the trigger to nothing. Either I’d forgotten to chamber a cartridge, left the safety on, or the rifle had a jam. It didn’t matter, I was just target shooting. However, I didn’t want to have to worry about any of those things as a new SD carrier. I wanted my focus to be completely on the mental changes that go with carrying a deadly SD weapon, not if my weapon would be ready to go when I needed it.

I also knew I’d carry daily at work, in an office setting, with business dress clothes. This really limited my options to small guns. I didn’t find any tiny 380 type autos that made me comfortable, but the J Frame could disappear in a pocket holster, and I knew with +P, had strong enough ammo to do the job, and I’d get “five for sure.”

After a couple years of daily carry, lots of training and getting completely into the mindset of the lifestyle, I added a pistol to my carry options, depending on dress and where I’m going. I trained a ton with the pistol before adding it, and got so used to it that I know it will work when I need it, so I knew I was ready to start using it. The main reason I would pick it over the revolver is because of the capacity. It’s comforting.

The first time I left the house with only the pistol, and my trusty little revolver in the safe at home, felt really odd. I usually keep the revolver in my pocket as a BUG, even when I have the pistol.

Like I said earlier in the thread, I’m now looking to get a larger revolver as a woods gun. There are places where a revolver just shines, and that’s one of them.

Different tools for different applications and needs, and that’s why, hopefully, we’ll continue having so many great options in both semiauto and revolvers. The revolver selection today is fantastic, and we’re all better off for it.

8 Likes

A close relative of mine has a Ruger SP101. Sure is a solid work of art, what great precision craftsmanship. Their’s has a black rubber factory grip.

Funny thing-- I just messaged them a moment ago, that since I switched to a different caliber, I’m going to gift them all of my .357 ammo, besides I love their company and they are great cooks. Win-win. LOl. :slight_smile:

8 Likes

Great points. Another reason I mainly carry my revolver is that I just don’t like carrying around a chambered pistol, and my DA Ruger is ready to go. At the range I run mostly 38 special though it (and close out my visit with 357 mag)… my wrists can’t handle 100 rounds of 357! haha. Though for my EDC it’s loaded with 357 mag JHPs.

6 Likes

I’ve always loved Rugers and the SP101 is no exception. They’re built like a tank and I appreciate the extra weight since it chambers 357 mag.

I did a trigger job on it using M*CARBOs kit and it made a noticeable difference. The trigger pull is about 3-4 pounds lighter now and much smoother.

I did a nice polish job on it with some Mother’s and polish bits with my Dremel, and I swapped out the grip to add support for my pinky which made a BIG difference.

9 Likes

Do you download the revolver and not keep a round in the chamber that’s under the hammer, or not keep a round in the first chamber up when trigger is pulled?

I mean, a revolver carried loaded has rounds in the all the chambers

5 Likes

Sure, but it’s such a heavier pull than a chambered 9mm that I feel better using that as my EDC.

3 Likes

Those stats were thrown around in a CCW class I took, and I was able to find some later online. Though, I understand many of the stats are skewed because we only see the reported cases where shots were fired, and not the unreported cases where NO shots were fired because an armed citizen avoided ANY fight or confrontation BECAUSE they were armed.

1 Like

I hear you. I used to have a 3" Kimber in .357, and when seeing my family member’s .357 Ruger; I thought it such high quality, tight, clean lines. I don’t have .357 any longer but I have two Ruger’s, good quality product for the money. Keepers for my needs.

4 Likes

My GP100 4" stainless .357 mag is almost never carried but…Ruger knows how to make a very nice, quality, affordable wheelgun. What you get for what you pay on them is well worth it

7 Likes

I LOVE REVOLVERS! Always Have! My first was a(686) Smith Gorgeous!
My newest (I finally got is a Ruger SuperBlack Hawk-stainless—melted m heart! (and my wallet!)

But this one I just was made aware of by my FFL —sneaky bast**d! Excellent Salesmen and Gunsmith…
Oh My God!


DIAMONDBACK SDR ! .357/ (6) rounds/ Hi-Polish ARGH! ARGH! ARGH! I HAVE to have one !
Price varies from $650-$750–I’m bargaining hard for the best price

Better pic

9 Likes

I’m holding out for a Chiappa Rhino 6” :sunglasses:

3 Likes


Like this?
What .357?

6 Likes

Hunter OD Green :sunglasses:

5 Likes

The Kimber K6 line is very intriguing, too.

4 Likes

That looks like a really nice revolver. It seems a lot different than the other firearms Diamondback makes. They make a lot of interesting designs but usually at the lower price point end of the spectrum.

I really want something along the lines of their Sidekick revolver as a fun plinking .22lr that can be switched to .22wmr. But the build quality on that one seems a little questionable according to some reviews.

3 Likes

I don’t know Sham, The Sidekick looks like a sturdy piece?
and it’s a Diamondback. (about $280)


Fot for my Sister years ago Heritage .22LR and Mag. ($150)
Sharp gun, changeable grips and solid construction. Just sayin’

6 Likes

It looks really sturdy. The main negative I read about it was that the double action trigger is incredibly heavy. But the single action trigger is supposedly decent. I did see a couple of reviews where people were having early wear issues on some of the parts. Looked like maybe due to poor fitting. Maybe they have worked out the kinks now?

Guess for the price I should just take a flyer on it though I would happily spend $100 more for a better DA trigger and a more modern front sight. With those and .22wmr cylinder it might make a decent self defense revolver for people who don’t like recoil.

3 Likes



I have 5 revolvers. Occasionally I will carry my 357mag in the winter

12 Likes