You’re not teaching anything I don’t already know! I’m only addressing the inaccuracy of what you wrote:
Zimmerman was not following a criminal while talking to the police. Apparently, from what you have written, you hold the position that a citizen (Zimmerman) has the right to PROFILE then label another citizen (Martin) as a criminal even though he did not witness that citizen commit a crime while he was on the phone with police. Thereafter, pursue a citizen (Martin) after the police told him not to! Now if Martin would have shot and killed Zimmerman after all that was recorded, there would not have been a trial because Martins actions would have been reasonable as he attempted to retreat when he did not have to. Zimmerman was the only one acting crazy that night if we are honest about the fact of the case!
And because of that event, I feel blessed to have the privilege and the precise ability if needed to counter those who think they have the same right Zimmerman thought he had.
My mindset, as well as others like me, are set in stone because of that night, and nothing is going to change it. Cause and effect; just staying frosty!