Will USCCA defend this case?

I explained this in the disclaimer where the basis came from. Just saying looking for clarification. I’m not posting the source link, but if you look up the AZ lawyer on YouTube, I’d love to hear a complete rebuttal of it, but so far haven’t heard much. Just curious. Thanks for your time. Appreciate it.

Being charged with a crime as a result of an “occurrence” does not in itself exclude potential coverage.