I don’t understand why they decided to wait, when it seems like they think Chevron deference isn’t warranted here. And are they going to merge this case with others in the lower courts? Or use those other cases as precedent for this one? And what happens to this case specifically, is this a loss for pro-gun or just more waiting?
Given that people’s property (bump stocks) was already destroyed/confiscated it is a loss.
Follow up, 2 years later.
SCOTUS again refused to hear a case on the bump stock ban.
This probably isn’t the most exciting topic for USCCA; we’re not exactly running around with concealed bump stocks under our belts. But legally speaking, it is interesting how this has played out.
2 Likes