'Spassberger’s' Attacks on 2nd Amendment Should Galvanize Gun Owners to Unite

“Abigail Spanberger’s war on guns [is] a clear and present danger to Virginia’s Second Amendment rights,” AmmoLand Correspondent Tred Law declared. “Despite her carefully polished image as a moderate, Spanberger’s actions—and promises—reveal her to be one of the most extreme anti-gun candidates ever to seek Virginia’s highest office.

“From public rallies with Moms Demand Action to her enthusiastic support of California-style gun bans, Spanberger has made it clear: if elected governor, she will sign into law a sweeping slate of gun control measures that would strip law-abiding Virginians of their constitutional rights,” Law noted.

Now a new article by Fox News says the former congresswoman and CIA operations officer has been accused of ethics violations for failing to list her home, worth $1M, being transferred to a trust benefiting her children on financial disclosure reports to Congress:

“The campaign for Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, who is aiming to replace incumbent GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, is calling the incomplete disclosures ‘a calculated lie,’ not an ‘accident.’ But, according to Spanberger’s campaign, the only asset contained in the trust is Spanberger’s personal residence, which is not required to be disclosed.”

As scandals go, that’s pretty weak tea, and anyone counting on it to be a showstopper and derail her campaign will be disappointed. And that’s too bad, because Marine veteran Earle-Sears promises to be as good on guns as Spanberger is bad.

“Marines know how to use guns, and I won’t ever support a red flag law!” she pledges on X.com. “The 2nd Amendment says, ‘shall not be infringed!’ #SemperFi.”

Spanberger, on the other hand, never saw a gun she didn’t want to grab. I’ve not made a point of following all the infringements she demands in detail because there are so many prohibitionist Democrat politicians out there, and I just don’t have the time, but here are a few items that have come across my desk over the years.

She bragged about her oath to the Constitution “put[ting] country first before party” while simultaneously bragging about all the ways she was undermining “the security of a free State.”From the original War on Guns site comes this demonstrable lie:

“Spanberger cited her background. A former officer in both law enforcement and the CIA, Spanberger said she grew up in a house filled with guns among a family of sportsmen. ‘I fully support the Second Amendment,’ she said. ‘It is a fundamental constitutional right, and I affirm that.’”**strong text… blah, blah, blah, blah…

If these Elite’s would make as much an effort into building America back up to her former GLORY instead of trying DISARMING US, OVER RULING, RESTRICTING, MANDATING US! with their Socialist/Communist Bullsh!t we might not have all this strife and UNREST.
All these folk’s do is ‘Protest, Rail and whine’ about every single issue that Trump try’s to
enact. They have no policies, No positive feedback, alternate course of action. They Sing! Have 'sit in’s, tired old Impeachment talk (from a doofus from India (a Congressman who nobody knew existed until yesterday) Who is this ass :clown_face: anyway? Looks kinda—oh nevamind.. :rofl:
It use to be worrisome all this Anger, resentment towards Trump but after (77) MILLION AMERICAN’S voted him back in I see the desperation of their actions. It’s sad really, like some folk’s on here that expect American’s to be deported next—‘Where’s that come from?’
How much TDS Kool-Aid do you have to drink in order to start perceiving that mindset?

‘IF YOU ARE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM’

Where We Go 1 We Go All
Nobody Can Stop What Is Coming

11 Likes

I wonder if she’s involved in installing or keeping third world despots in power, she had front row seat to witnessing how gun bans work.

10 Likes

Our forefathers worded the 2nd Amusement in simplified terms hoping that people would know what was meant by their writings and discussions in getting the constitution written. If we read Jefferson, Washington and so many others, we see what their motives were for the 2nd Amendment. It was made clear, very clear, that this amendment was designed to counter any and all activities that a government could enact against its people that was of a detrimental nature. Their motive was to protect the citizens of this government from what the British government attempted to impose on the colonists. It simply meant that the people had to be able to counter any and all attempts that their government would use against them if it went “rogue.” You cannot counter that which is sufficiently superior. Therefore, our forefathers never intended there to be any restriction on the definition of arms, otherwise if such existed, the people would be in a predetermined position to lose if they were could not answer an attempt to subjugate the people. In light of this, there can be no restrictions or limitations on what the people can own to insure their survival against a government that starts to mimic what the British were attempting….PERIOD!

10 Likes

:thinking: Another social activist registered as a Democrat running for Governor. Just hope she loses.

8 Likes

If they vote her in…they asked for it.

6 Likes

:thinking: If they vote her in then that means that there are far more anti-gun and anti-2A activists than there are pro-2A citizens. Hopefully Sears gets voted in!

3 Likes

Precisely.

4 Likes