It’s one good place to start. The problem is that we can reach less than 2% of the students even if we got those programs into every charter and private school in the country.
We have however over 10,000 small rural districts across the country most of which I think could be amenable to such programs.
We could then reach very quickly over the course of just a few years over half the districts in the country.
Just like with things like Arming teachers the state and national teachers unions and big city schools all went ballistic screaming gloom and doom while quietly hundreds of smaller rural districts across the country began allowing teachers/staff to carry and many actually sent their faculty and staff for advanced training. Of course, we’ve seen none of the gloom and doom predictions prove true and those schools that post signage (our faculty and staff are armed and will defend our students with deadly force) type signs have seen zero attempted mass shootings.
When we can quickly establish a large footprint, and then produce the data to show the programs work, it pretty well destroys the arguments against them and builds up successive generations of people that reject the false narrative of the anti gun left.
More from our private discussion at Z’s insistance/permission.