I’ve posted previously on this subject int 2020, 21, 22 and 24. Your publication of record, American Hunter, American Rifleman or First Freedom if you are a life member (or higher) to the National Rifle Associated, will contain the bios of the 49 candidates running for one of those 28 seats on the NRA Board and your ballot to vote for 28 of them.
The Board of Directors (BOD) and their committee assigns are responsible to oversee the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Doug Hamlin a (contracted position) and the NRA President, Bob Bar. This oversight is what was lacking during LaPierre’s tenure. While some BOD members knew about the extravagances of the CEO, they failed at taking action.
How does the NRA CEO succeed at flying under the radar of the BOD? By installing a BOD that is friendly to the CEO. Yes men and women that either fear him or fear the ramifications to their NRA position by bringing egregious behavior of the CEO to the attention of the board, and doing so would be perceived as destructive to the organization
The method the previous NRA CEO used to install a friendly BOD is the NRA Nominating committee. The voting members of the NRA (you and me) do not spend a great deal of time investigating the candidates for the NRA board and take at face value, the recommendations of the NRA Nominating committee and the bios written by the candidate directors themselves.
The 2025 NRA nominating committee is comprised of Scott L. Bach (current board member), Charles R Beers III (current board member), Cyndi Flannigan, Duane Liptak (previous board member), Robert E Mansell and Jay Printz (current board member). Mr. Printz and Mr. Mansell were elected Chairman and Vice Chairman respectively, of the nominating committee.
Has the 2025 NRA nominating committee provided a selection of YES men and women?
Unknown, but the fact that Duane Liptak is a member gives an indication the nominating committee may not be promoting YES men and women. Mr. Liptak resigned from the board days before the NRA filed for bankruptcy with this statement “I am no longer able to effectively perform the duties of director with what I feel is the appropriate level of oversight.”
Unfortunately, a resolution adopted by the committee gives a concerning bit of language. “We the members of the NRA2024-2025 Nominating Committee gather with a clear and unified purpose to select qualified and constructive candidates for the 2025 election ballot…”
The constructive clause in the resolution is troubling. It could be interpreted that any director who raises concerns about CEO behavior, as being destructive to the association. Time will tell if the BOD will in fact perform its function or just be another group of yes men and women to squander the members contributions.
I have zero confidence in the recommendations of the NRA nominating committee and even less confidence in any BOD member who was present during the previous CEO’s flagrant mis-use of member’s dollars. If you were nominated by members petition, you have my vote. If your bio states you were recommended by the NRA nominating committee, I bypassed your bubble. If you are coy and stayed on the fence in your bio and didn’t state how you got on the list, I bypassed your bubble.
For the NRA members, executives and Directors reading this, know that thousands of dollars that would have gone to the NRA are now heading to FPC, GOA.
See you in Atlanta Saturday morning, 2025