I can’t post the link due to ‘embedded’ BS in the link. It’s from the Washington Examiner
(google it Boot!) …if you care.
–basically these (2) “perfessers” put their heads together (to make one apparently) and said:
“Qualified immunity shields state officers from monetary liability for many constitutional violations,” the scholars wrote. “In short, unless a previous case ‘clearly established,’ with high factual particularity, that the officer’s conduct was unconstitutional, the officer does not pay.”
Under their theory, law enforcement can “confiscate an individual’s firearm if the officer deems that person too dangerous to possess it.” Even if the justifications “conflict” with Bruen and other Second Amendment jurisprudence, the officer “risks no liability.”
“The result is a surprisingly free hand for states to determine who should and should not be armed, even in contravention of the Supreme Court’s dictates,” the professors argue.
I can hear the Jack boots a comin’! Thoughts?
I’m thinking these “professors” are suffering from an extreme case of Cranial-Rectal Implantation OR are direct descendants of the Professor on “Gilligan’s Island”, who could build all kinds of complex items in attempts to get off of the island but patching the hole on the “Minnow” was far beyond his capabilities.
Here is the article:
And here is the actual source Law Review article:
The word “perverssor” is not in the dictionary, and I’ve never heard it before. Strangely, I knew what it means and even could see a mental image of these 2 giants of jurisprudence.
I didnt think the article was worth my reading time, but I noted that Law School as a place not to seek for education, should a question arise in the future.
Thank you A-8 for NOT calling me on a supposed Phunnie in Professor spelling.
The point of the article (In my opinion) is that 'These Left leaning Multiple A-hole’s
Have been trying to create Laws/establish new way’s to destroy our Second Amendment Rights and
deliberately attempt to squash OUR First Amendment Rights while they are at it.
OUR GUNS SCARE THE BEJESUS OUT OF THEM! They want our Guns gone and us gunners with them!
So, If they throw (50) Bills, Laws, New Legislation at the wall and only (5) stick! THEY WILL EVENTUALLY WIN! And we cannot let them WIN!
Thank you for coming up with a new and brilliant word. I will use it. Pervessors.
Darn, I don’t own a boat. Fortunately, my brother has one… and I bet he would love to help me clean my guns while out on the lake, right???
“You’re gonna need a bigger boat!”
Roy Schieder JAWS.
Tucking this away for when I need it next. Thanks for your word-smithing. I’m stealing it.
Feel free to distribute as needed. It seems to me that this affliction is quite widespread these days. No theft involved. Another opinion of mine regards the Cheney-Kinzinger January 6 hearings being an example of a Canine-Equine Extravaganza.
Hate to admit how long it took me to figure that one out. I’m slow today. Another good one for the broad application file.