this would be great if true and it happens. giving a big FAFO to all that received one.
Wont happen, or atleast a serious outcome. Too much swamp involved
I am fairly sure it is true. I donât know about a . The truth will come out to those that have the fortitude to see it.
Yea, I think Presidential Pardons are pretty bullet proof. Itâs like âIt is what it is because I, The President of The United States, said it is.â.
The pardons are null and void if they can prove bidenâs âsignaturesâ are forged/ counterfeit.
That doesnât seem difficult to do given Bidenâs mental state and the people he pardoned.
All I can say is, I canât wait until the truth comes out. Who knew what. when they knew it and the $10,000.00 question, who was pulling the strings. Was it Barry? Maybe George? Could it have been Hillary? OR was it Jill, hovering around in the back ground calling the shots.
I think that is the $10 question. The $10,000.00 question is was it Biden? Just sayin.
It was Biden. Ok.
But, was it Jill?
Unless they rat on each other we will never know.
I wouldnât be surprised if they started ratting each other out. Theyâre doing a pretty good job of tossing their âLoyal Followersâ under the bus when they are no longer useful to their ânarrativeâ.
I was thinking the same thing.
Another step down the road of dismantling the rule of law and replacing it with political lawfare.
Be careful what you wish for. If the MO AG is successful, that would set precedent for any state to challenge any Presidentâs pardons.
Sounds about right
And which side started the precidents?
THE DEMS OPENED PANDORAâS BOX.
This is the same Attorney General suing Starbucks for not enough white males working as baristas, like that is a problem. Seriously if you are a white male working at Starbucks you made a lot of bad decisions in life. So I donât see this going anywhere.
Made me laughâŠ
And it ends, where? I doubt that Pandoraâs box will be closed until the rule of law is completely abandoned for a system of political prosecutions.
I have no problem with political prosecutions as long as the evidence is solid & publicly shared.
For far too long, Washington has been unaccountable to we the people.
The 34 felonies they made up to persecute Trump were a total sham, and THATâs why he is in office now, because the majority of voters saw it exactly for what it was, and said, this has got to end now.
I have no problem with pardons or commutations conveyed upon those who were convicted of crimes, many of which were politically motivated or non-violent. HOWEVER, I DO have a problem with pardons and commutations conveyed PRE-EMPTIVELY, to individuals that received them without having been CONVICTED of any crime. In my view, those individuals are INELIGIBLE for such things but, having accepted such pardons/commutations, they have ADMITTED guilt and should be investigated and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.