How to describe a suspect - DOJ proposal

Remember this?


Mrs.Swan got a big promotion in DC now!

8 Likes

How does Garland even have his job anymore?

9 Likes

He is protected by Brandon. What a crock, lets hobble LE a little more. :roll_eyes:

7 Likes

Do you expect cops to catch suspects? We all know who the real threat is.

9 Likes

I don’t expect much from him, he didn’t prosecute the mob that went to Kavanah’s house

7 Likes

This all started with obama. I was talking with an Immigration Officer in 2010 who came to our Jail to pick up a Mexican illegal who was arrested on a Domestic Violence charge.
He said that obama justice dept (loretta lynch) changed the rules so that he could not arrest an illegal unless he committed a crime and was in jail. He was pissed. :roll_eyes:

9 Likes

Only a dimwit like garland would take suspect description advice from Mrs. Swan.

3 Likes

“Protected Characteristics” :question:
Who comes up with this crap.

That’s the one, I’d know it anywhere!

Serial killers will be coming out of the shadows!

5 Likes

Thus it would be correct to report: "a non-gender specific, race and nationality fluid individual or plurality, that may or may not have arrived from somewhere else, with no known or suspected religious or sexual orientation preferences or disabilities or lack whereof, has or may possibly in the future, perform an overt or covert action that would, by a non-discriminating individual or plurality, possible be construed to constitute an action not legal or of otherwise questionable circumstance. Seems perfectly clear to me.

8 Likes

Can unique skin art (tattoos) be used to identify a non-specific non-entity? This wasn’t specified in the prohibitions, so I was wondering if the omission was deliberate or unintentional.

2 Likes

Yes, but you can’t use any of the “prohibited descriptors” in doing so! :grin:

3 Likes

Thought this might fit in here with a dark sense of humor. :thinking:

Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/)

Follow

Liberals get mugged by reality. Literally

Opinion by Zachary Faria • 1h ago

Enabling criminals and calling it “criminal justice reform” is dangerous for everyone involved — even for the pro-criminal advocates themselves. Chaos, after all, tends to have a dark sense of humor.

Oakland bakery owner Jen Angel, a “long-time social movement activist and anarchist,” as described by her loved ones on a GoFundMe page, was brutally killed earlier this year. Two thieves smashed her car window, stole her purse, and drove off. Angel chased the car and got caught in the door, leading to her being dragged 50 feet.

CRIME IS JUST A ‘BASIC CITY EXPERIENCE’ IN SAN FRANCISCO

Angel’s loved ones said that they did not want the men who killed her to receive jail time, because it would only “perpetuate more harm.” They get some credit for sticking to principle but the story does not end there. On Sunday, a friend of Angel’s was on her way across the bay to attend a memorial service for Angel that was to center on her commitment to “restorative justice.” That friend was jumped by two teenage girls who shoved her to the ground, stomped and kicked her head and face, and stole her bag and cell phone.

To paraphrase Irving Kristol, a conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. So what happens to social justice activists who get mugged by the criminals they fight to keep out of jail?

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE IN THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

The dark irony of this saga lays bare the consequences of listening to those who would have criminals run free in society. Criminals do not care whether you are a social justice activist or not. They do not care if you support “restorative justice.” They are predators who see you as a target. And when they realize they face no real consequences for going after you, thanks to the very criminal justice reforms that you support, they will attack and harm you.

Some activists might be okay with that, as it appears Angel and her activist friends are. (Although she wasn’t okay enough to let those robbers just take her purse and go, apparently). But just because those people want to live their lives as easy targets for criminals, it doesn’t mean everyone should be forced to share in their suffering. City leaders and voters do not need to listen to these people. It’s not like the criminals do.

Tags: Beltway Confidential, Opinion, Crime, Criminal Justice, Criminal Justice Reform, Criminal

Original Author: Zachary Faria

5 Likes

Gotta love KARMA. Just like MURPHY.
Or Murphy’s Karma…whatever can happen, happens when they deserve it!

5 Likes

So, they intentionally want to be a victims? Ok, you do you, don’t complain later.

5 Likes

Their entire world-view is morally bankrupt and self-destructive. But when you read things like this, you also realize something else:

It is also shockingly stupid. Just raw, plain, simply stupid. Stoopid!

7 Likes

I made the same observation, not about this, but about Gates, Zuck, Claus Schwab and Harari of WEF. How can this be, richest people in the world, tremendous companies, banks, I thought, maybe its just me. I now am confident, they are stupid, and on top of it, we know they are like conjoined twins with Obummer/Brandon regimes.

3 Likes

I wonder if “what goes around, comes around” gives the bleeding hearts a clue? Maybe if they get stomped, they will become Republican!

In the days of applying and studying to get into law enforcement being able to pick up on details of a person in a split second was a key skill to have. Situational awareness was taught to us even back in the early 80’s. Also being able to put pieces of information together to come up with a back story someone might not be clearly telling. This is also why you are told not to say anything when in a self-defense situation to the police. It is actually fun to get info out of people without them even knowing they are giving you information. The X wife hated it.

1 Like