Posted on April 6, 2026 by Jose Nino
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled Columbus can immediately appeal an injunction blocking its magazine ban and firearm storage ordinance, adding a new procedural hurdle for gun owners. Img Jim Grant.
The battle to defend the Second Amendment in Ohio took an unwelcome turn with a recent state Supreme Court ruling that gives anti-gun municipalities new tools to fight injunctions blocking their unconstitutional ordinances.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ohio is a preemption state. Local governments lack the authority to enact gun control measures beyond what state law explicitly permits. But Columbus decided to test those limits anyway. In December 2022, the city council approved two ordinances targeting gun owners. The first banned âlarge capacity magazinesâ capable of holding more than 30 rounds. The second created a new offense for ânegligent storage of a firearm.â
Six anonymous citizens brought a lawsuit challenging both measures as violations of R.C. 9.68 and Article I, Section 4 of the Ohio Constitution. In April 2023, a Delaware County Common Pleas Court judge issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of the ordinances while the case, known as Doe v. Columbus, proceeded through litigation.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rather than wait for a final ruling, Columbus sought to appeal the injunction immediately. According to a report by Court News Ohio, the Fifth District Court of Appeals rejected the appeal, determining it had no jurisdiction until the trial court completed the case. Columbus escalated the matter to the stateâs highest court.
By a 5-2 margin, the Ohio Supreme Court sided with Columbus. The majority determined that a preliminary injunction blocking a municipality from enforcing a new ordinance constitutes a âfinal orderâ subject to immediate appeal.
Justice Daniel R. Hawkins authored the majority opinion, explaining that both the state and municipalities possess a âsovereign interestâ in enacting and enforcing legislation. He wrote that âa courtâs order enjoining the operation of such laws causes irreparable injury to that sovereign interest.â
ADVERTISEMENT
Chief Justice Sharon L. Kennedy joined the opinion along with Justices R. Patrick DeWine, Joseph T. Deters, and Megan E. Shanahan. Justice Patrick F. Fischer dissented without issuing a written opinion.
The majority grounded its reasoning in the Home Rule Amendment of the Ohio Constitution, which grants municipalities broad authority to regulate for the public welfare. âOtherwise stated, the Home Rule Amendment confers on municipalities a sovereign interest in exercising police powers to enact legislation for the public good,â the opinion stated.
The justices recognized the inherent conflict between elected bodies passing laws and courts reviewing their constitutionality. âIn this case, the city enacted ordinances that its elected councilmembers and mayor believe â rightly or wrongly â will address gun violence in their city. A single trial judge â rightly or wrongly â found these ordinances facially unconstitutional and â with the stroke of a pen â enjoined the city from enforcing them.â
Justice Jennifer Brunner filed a dissent contending that state law provides no automatic right for municipalities to appeal preliminary injunctions. She observed that the General Assembly passed an amendment in 2024 giving the state itself the authority to appeal such injunctions after trial judges blocked state laws. That amendment, however, excluded municipalities from its scope.
âIn total, the majority points to no specific harm actually suffered by the city in requiring it to wait until after the case is fully litigated to institute an appeal,â Justice Brunner wrote. âBut more importantly, the majorityâs rationale ignores the harm suffered by plaintiffs in cases like this if an unconstitutional law is imposed on them.â
Justice Brunner cautioned that the majorityâs logic would allow any municipality whose ordinance is temporarily blocked to bypass the statutory requirements of R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) governing when orders become final and appealable. She maintained that a city seeking the most effective remedy should appeal after a full trial with complete evidence and argument, not before the underlying constitutional question is resolved.
Addressing those who might worry about a single judge wielding too much power, Justice Brunner emphasized that Ohioâs judicial branch is âempowered and required to rein in laws that go too far.â
The Supreme Court sent the case back to the Fifth District to evaluate the substance of Columbusâs appeal.
This decision represents a setback for every Ohioan who believes in the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. The ruling enables cities like Columbus to prolong legal battles over clearly unconstitutional gun restrictions by appealing injunctions the moment they are issued.
Gun owners will now face the burden of fighting the same legal war across multiple courts while hostile municipalities exploit procedural loopholes to keep their illegal laws in play. The entire purpose of Ohioâs preemption statute is to prevent local governments from creating a maze of conflicting gun regulations that burden law-abiding citizens.
When the courts make it easier for cities to evade that protection, the Second Amendment pays the price. Ohioans who cherish their rights must remain vigilant and recognize that this fight is far from over.
. There was the Long article on a favorite podcast that said it so wellâ The Delusion of the Left is complete (along with a widespread case of severe TDS) that these Criminals BELIEVE in their Black Hearts that a) They will (in their RESISTANCE (which I call TREASON and Sedition) they will eventually regain the BIG CHAIRS during the âMid-Termâ elections which anybody with some semblance of active Brain cells left knows THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN!âYou canât have an Election when MOST of the Radical Left will either be in Jail or Dead for their actions trying to destroy a sitting President and create an environment in this country where ANARCHY is the soup of the day. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. Not on Trumps watch. (and he isnât going anywhere!) then B) They CONTINUE to try and STEAL everything that isnât nailed down (or they havenât stolen yet). C) They KNOW they are running around the empty decks of the Titanic looking for that last Lifeboat only to realize that the only folkâs left aboard are them and the RATâS that supported the demise of America.