Grounds for mistrial!
Being a Brooklyn boy thatâs the first thing that came to mind. Nobody drives in the city, those jurors are certainly riding the train for jury duty!
They should be scared to death.
Say, how is it we donât know the make up of the jury? Sorta curious!
Ummm⊠yer kidding, right???
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding! Nailed it B !
Everybody knows the babby-lon Bee Buzz Buzz is Satirical amirite?
Yup⊠specally since ya posted it earlier.
I am sure it was withheld intentionally, like maybe biased against the defendant for one consideration.
The IDâs of the jurors should be confidential for their safety & security from harm as this is a highly politicized and controversial case intentionally inflammatory, etc.
The holdouts from convicting likely had their IDs leaked for this outcome intentionally, and the leaker needs to be brought to justice.
Sometimes I donât know why I bother.
JUROR #1
A marketing and communications rep for a nonprofit art agency who said she has seen outbursts on the subway before and previously served as an alternate juror on an armed robbery case.
Originally from New Jersey, she said she feels apprehensive about being physically threatened, has a masterâs degree in theater management and teaches marketing on the side.
JUROR #2
A male who lives in Washington Heights and works in health care. During the selection process, he said he had never seen a disturbance from a subway rider.
He came to the U.S. from his native Philippines.
JUROR #3
A computer programmer from the East Village who is originally from Atlanta. He rides the subway occasionally, has never seen an outburst or been threatened and likes video games.
JUROR #4
A female lawyer from Yorkville. She had family members in both the military and police departments but said she will be able to follow the judgeâs instructions and be a fair juror.
She has witnessed subway outbursts and has felt personally targeted.
JUROR #5
A retiree from the Upper East Side who said during the selection process that he rides the subway once or twice a week and has witnessed outbursts and has felt personally targeted but has not called police.
Heâs previously sat on two grand juries.
A retired librarian from Morningside Heights, near Columbia University. She served on a jury a decade ago, her daughter was once assaulted in Times Square, and despite riding the subway daily she has never seen an outburst or been targeted herself.
JUROR #7
A man from the Upper West Side who rides the subway regularly but said he had never been harassed on the cityâs rail system. He has seen outbursts, however.
JUROR #8
An East Village woman who came to the U.S. from Ukraine 45 years ago. She is a retired journalist who works in a gift shop and supports her unemployed son.
She said she does not ride the subway as much as she used to but has never had any problems.
JUROR #9
A woman originally from Nebraska who has lived on the Upper West Side for more than 40 years with her husband, a former advertiser who survived a street mugging.
Sheâs served on two prior juries and said âYes, of courseâ she has witnessed subway outbursts, although none had targeted her personally.
JUROR #10
A West Village woman who endured harassment on a near-empty subway car and said during the selection process that force could be justified under certain circumstances.
Despite her harrowing subway encounter, she said she didnât call police. She and her friend switched cars instead to get away from an erratic man who was swearing at them and calling them names.
JUROR #11
A midtown lawyer who survived a robbery four years ago. A regular subway rider, he said he has witnessed outbursts but has never been personally attacked.
JUROR #12
A paralegal who doesnât work on criminal cases.
She said she is a regular straphanger who has seen outbursts but never been personally harassed.
The twelve jurors and four alternates took their seats Friday for opening statements.
Penny is a 25-year-old Marine Corps veteran and college student majoring in architecture.
Neely was a 30-year-old homeless man and former Michael Jackson impersonator with a history of mental illness and criminality, including a prior charge for assaulting a 67-year-old New York City woman in 2021.
Penny faces up to 19 years in prison if convicted.
Original article source: Daniel Penny trial: Meet the jurors who will decide Marine veteranâs fate in subway chokehold case
Thanks for that, it beats speculation.
WAIT! Before this gets any deeper and we need a shovelâ
WE DO KNOW THIS IS A FICTIONAL STORY AMIRITE?
No Juror got beat
No Jury Tampering
This story came from the Babylon Bee! A Satirical (Mad Magazine) type website.
in other words:
IT NEVER HAPPENED!
kinda like:
OKAY?
Thanks, good to know.
But they canât put it on the internet if it isnât true.
Hypothetically, maybe the jury should consider one question!
Who is more likely to re-offend and kill an innocent person if, under the current laws, under the Bragg/Biden/Soros administration with NO BAIL
If Neely didnât die, and was freed by NY laws how many minutes would it take him to kill someone on another train? How many would he kill?
Thankfully Brother, the world will NEVER KNOW.
Amazing story.
Reminds me of the 1984 Bernhard Goetz story:
NYC has always been a Lunatic Left Asylum with the Lunatics in charge of the Asylum. Especially now.
The Theater of the Absurd with Sorosâ installed Alvan Bragg as the leading actor who lets the Bad Guy Nut Jobs and Criminals free to reoffend setting up these situations where a Good Guy acting as a protector gets persecuted for doing so.
In the Land of Back Ass-wards.
Itâs enough to drive a Sane person Insane.
A total crying shame.
I hope that Danial Penny gets acquitted and sues the plants off NYC especially Alvin Bragg for malpractice or malfeasance abuse of office and his failures to preform his duty, and this malicious prosecution.
Alvin Bragg needs to be tried, convicted, sentenced and incarcerated for his crimes and then suffer prison justice for all of his nonsense that he has perpetrated on the citizens of NYC.
If anyone hasnât heard yet, Neely has been found not guilty. Right now all the loony lefties are holding a press conference saying how racist the outcome is. Looking at who was on the platform, every person was black. One person even had a âklan busterâ jacket on.
I think we have a little we pots think you kettles are very black going on here.
Not Neely. Daniel Penny found not guilty. Reactions to the verdict appear to be âcolor-codedâ.
Thank you for the correction
(Yeah, one for the Good Guys! That nut job criminal with a long history of violence should not have been in public to reoffend repeatedly as a menace to society perpetrated on the citizens.
Then this whole circus clown
trial to discourage a good citizen from protecting other good citizens would never of had to happen in the first place if the âsystemâ was not usurped from doing its duty appropriately, by properly addressing a repeat offenderâs recidivism.)