Best 44 Mag Speed Loader? Looking for Real User Reviews

Hi everyone,

I am looking to pick up a speed loader for my 44 Mag 44 Special 6 shot revolver, mainly for range practice and I would like to hear from people who have real hands on experience. I have been reading reviews, but they seem to be all over the place. Some people say certain models have excellent retention and smooth releases, while others mention issues after extended use. It is hard to tell what is actually worth buying.

I found one on Amazon that caught my attention. If anyone has used this particular one, I would love to hear your thoughts on it.

https://www.amazon.com/RevIndustries-Speed-Loader-6-Cylinder-Revolvers/dp/B0FZMDFSHQ

For those of you who regularly shoot 44 Mag or 44 Special revolvers, which speed loader has worked best for you? I am mainly looking for something that is reliable, durable and operates smoothly over time.

If you have tried different brands or models, I would really appreciate hearing what you liked, what you did not like, and what you would recommend. Thanks in advance!

2 Likes

it depends on what 44 Mag you have

my 629 S&W I had to remove the factory wood grips to get the clearance for the speed loader to work

got Pachmayr grips now

3 Likes

That’s the one I use Brother… Awesome.

.44 Anaconda

5 Likes

I struggled to get clearance for the mechanical speed loaders on my Redhawk.

Finally went to:

5 Likes

Tuff Products Quickstrip Belt Pouch

4 Likes

I have a Ruger Redhawk. That is interesting to know about the grip clearance issue, I had not considered that. Glad to hear the Pachmayr grips solved the problem for you.

1 Like

I had not looked much into the Galco E-Z Loader. Has it been reliable for you during regular range use?

3 Likes

My speedloader experience is with a K-frame 357 using Pachmayr grips. I’ve been happy with both the Safariland Comp II speedloaders and the HKS speedloaders for different reasons.

For me, the Safariland Comp II is a simpler manual of arms. You just push the speedloader into the cylinder and it releases the bullets. However it is mostly plastic. They have a longer version (Comp III) if you are used to a certain technique (easier to grab because of the longer grip).

However, I usually use the HKS because of my belt pouch setup. The HKS is part plastic and part metal. Instead of a push, you have to twist the knob to release the bullets. I use these because my preferred carry method uses a Desantis Second Six Speedloader Pouch, which places half of the bullets on the inside of the belt and half on the outside. This cuts in half the size of the speedloader sticking out from your belt.

This pouch doesn’t work with the Safariland Comp II or III because placing the belt through the middle of the speedloader releases the bullets on that design of speedloader.

I have much better functionality with the Galco. I struggled to align the loader and the cylinder with both the Safariland and the HKS.

The pouches work well with the straps on my chest rig.

Keeping in mind that “one mans meat is another mans poison”, Who knows!

Maybe we should ask the Shadow!

3 Likes

My only experience is with HKS on Model 29s. Absolutely no complaints and clearance with both the original S&W wood stocks and rubber Pachmayrs.

1 Like

It is always helpful hearing from someone who has spent time with more than one option. This definitely gives me a better idea of what to look for before I buy one.

1 Like

Real world use is exactly what I am interested in hearing about. It seems like what works best can really come down to personal preference and setup.

Thanks for sharing that, it is good to hear another positive experience with the HKS. The fact that you have had no issues with it definitely gives me a little more confidence in that option.

True in so many ways. Both cylinder round drop models would not easily clear the factory or Pachmayr grips on my Redhawk. When I got them seated after the struggle, the drop knob was tricky for my old hands.

In my case the KISS principle applied to me!

1 Like

Keep in mind that not all S&W n-frame stocks are identical. Some have a scallop cut some don’t.
Off hand I don’t recall which one my 29 came with as I’ve changed over to Pachmayr over a decade ago.
I’m getting old and the Pachmayr takes some of the sting out

1 Like

That makes sense. It seems like ease of use can be just as important as speed, especially if a particular design is difficult to operate consistently. I appreciate you sharing your experience.

1 Like

That is helpful to know. I had not realized there could be differences between the various N-frame stocks when it comes to clearance and I can definitely understand wanting a little extra comfort when shooting a 44 Mag.

1 Like